CLAUD
@riaclaud.bsky.social
The documents released by the Office of the Ombudsman under Jesus Crispin Remulla also include earlier rulings from former Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales for context.
October 30, 2025 at 3:58 AM
The documents released by the Office of the Ombudsman under Jesus Crispin Remulla also include earlier rulings from former Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales for context.
The 2019 ruling granted Villanueva’s Motion for Reconsideration, reversing the 2016 decision and dismissing the case entirely.
“Accordingly, the present case against them is hereby DISMISSED.”
“Accordingly, the present case against them is hereby DISMISSED.”
October 30, 2025 at 3:58 AM
The 2019 ruling granted Villanueva’s Motion for Reconsideration, reversing the 2016 decision and dismissing the case entirely.
“Accordingly, the present case against them is hereby DISMISSED.”
“Accordingly, the present case against them is hereby DISMISSED.”
The Ombudsman also cited findings from the NBI showing that Villanueva’s signatures in the questioned documents were forgeries.
October 30, 2025 at 3:58 AM
The Ombudsman also cited findings from the NBI showing that Villanueva’s signatures in the questioned documents were forgeries.
The 2019 decision found no adequate evidence linking Villanueva to any embezzlement or misuse of funds.
“There is no adequate evidence on record showing that Villanueva was actually involved in the embezzlement of ₱9,700,000.00 in public funds.”
“There is no adequate evidence on record showing that Villanueva was actually involved in the embezzlement of ₱9,700,000.00 in public funds.”
October 30, 2025 at 3:58 AM
The 2019 decision found no adequate evidence linking Villanueva to any embezzlement or misuse of funds.
“There is no adequate evidence on record showing that Villanueva was actually involved in the embezzlement of ₱9,700,000.00 in public funds.”
“There is no adequate evidence on record showing that Villanueva was actually involved in the embezzlement of ₱9,700,000.00 in public funds.”
The questioned funds came from the 2008 PDAF allocation of Villanueva as CIBAC Party-list Representative.
The ₱9.7M was intended for agricultural livelihood projects implemented through the NGO Aaron Foundation Philippines, Inc. (AFPI) and National Agribusiness Corporation (NABCOR).
The ₱9.7M was intended for agricultural livelihood projects implemented through the NGO Aaron Foundation Philippines, Inc. (AFPI) and National Agribusiness Corporation (NABCOR).
October 30, 2025 at 3:58 AM
The questioned funds came from the 2008 PDAF allocation of Villanueva as CIBAC Party-list Representative.
The ₱9.7M was intended for agricultural livelihood projects implemented through the NGO Aaron Foundation Philippines, Inc. (AFPI) and National Agribusiness Corporation (NABCOR).
The ₱9.7M was intended for agricultural livelihood projects implemented through the NGO Aaron Foundation Philippines, Inc. (AFPI) and National Agribusiness Corporation (NABCOR).
Villanueva filed his Motions for Reconsideration in November and December 2016, contesting a previous decision that found him and others guilty of grave misconduct and serious dishonesty.
October 30, 2025 at 3:58 AM
Villanueva filed his Motions for Reconsideration in November and December 2016, contesting a previous decision that found him and others guilty of grave misconduct and serious dishonesty.