The expense of other nations.

Now, if you live in a world of need, you don't deserve to have a say to get better wages. That's left for the government to decide.

See how slippery your soapbox is?

If you do that, then, why are you complaining about the sacrifice of the poor? They aren't important if you're going to base the world specifically on need. If you care so deeply for the poor, why go for ideology designed to trick the poor? I guess Hitler was right in helping his german people at

And other ideas compel the wrong types of business owners to only pursue profit without investing into the company and its workers.

But I will say a company shouldn't pay more than what a worker is willing or of demand in work.

Of the middle class and poor. Now, if the corporations set a wage above the minimum wage, then it would offset the rate of forced inflation naturally, which ultimately leave the poor to spend more with their dollars.

Secondly, with how taxes are done, and for the idea a company is just for profit,

Capitalist society, man is free to condemn such practices as you have described in regards to travesty for if a company you describe then this would make the responsible money maker to play better wages.

But for state sanctioned corporations, the minimum wage laws actually hurt the spending power

Now if we follow that line of abstraction, then we're no different than the oppressors of the so called workers and the poor. Its the system we allow to push Capitalism out of the main grounds as Capitalism is the only system that allows the free trade of goods. This, would mean that in a civilised

I disagree as Capitalism is not what that is. What you are referring is of a mixed economy of state sponsored corporations — those, are the ones to seek such injustices but I will say I'm somewhat in the same boat but I disagree on your axiums of classwarfare as that is inherently Marxist in idea.

Shucks. Where did all of that time go?

Diane Foxington is so cool. I really enjoyed how well put the first one was. I have yet to read the books.

Similarly that if 'Hitler says something, the wolk must follow. And if there are any dissenters, they must be Jewish or Bolshivik.'

Besides that, I am more intrigued that Hugh is selected to be Dumbledor as Hugh himself is a capable and comperable actor.

Guess someone else is gonna miss out. To allow your emotions to cloud your judgment is sad.

Well, at least I don't care for any group in a nonsensical way beyond the mere emotions of a creator.

As likewise to your flimsy statement of a poor attempt at some sort of moral superiority is to say

Down our throats and theirs. That you mean nothing without tribal representation. And to say everything needs to be Non-A then it would be the same as 'This needs more Aryian representation.'

To me, and I'm sure others would contend that, we find this mess of over repsentaion poorly represents the Non-A's.

From my observations, they pace at how badly to be represented to a points it makes me think a National Socialist propagandist is working with them. Constantly shoving worms

supposed to be a Star Wars show but it was swayed and jumbled up that representation meant more than the plot and movement of the story. The result was failure. They wish the keep kicking this dead horse with a bigger dead horse, a movie.

Of the multiple non-A's and their collectivist conspirators to incite the motion that to make a has a proper cast based on source to be twisted and viewed as wrong. Why is this? For the sake to bullying from the Non-A's on no representation. Let us look at the Acalyte, it failed at what it was

Isn't yours. A is A. B is B. If you must state A and B is Z, build your own space to segregate yourselves as you constantly beg for roles that wouldn't make sense in a specific movie or whatnot. Principle is relatively the same when Race comes into play. That, representation is key for preservation