retfma
@retfma.de
Was ist denn mit den Tomaten passiert?
December 14, 2025 at 10:01 AM
Was ist denn mit den Tomaten passiert?
Gibt es den Podcast als rss feed irgendwo?
November 9, 2025 at 11:23 AM
Gibt es den Podcast als rss feed irgendwo?
Cool project, happy to support a little :)
October 28, 2025 at 1:30 PM
Cool project, happy to support a little :)
Maybe a good compromise would be to cache history for users, who already read the post before it got edited, but not save the history on the server for everyone to see.
September 9, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Maybe a good compromise would be to cache history for users, who already read the post before it got edited, but not save the history on the server for everyone to see.
Convience is not the only difference, that's my main point.
If you write something publicly and someone reacts publicly, editing the initial statement (with an ill intent) can change the whole statement. If the initial statement is just deleted,it's obvious, that they retracted it for some reason.
If you write something publicly and someone reacts publicly, editing the initial statement (with an ill intent) can change the whole statement. If the initial statement is just deleted,it's obvious, that they retracted it for some reason.
September 9, 2025 at 3:59 PM
Convience is not the only difference, that's my main point.
If you write something publicly and someone reacts publicly, editing the initial statement (with an ill intent) can change the whole statement. If the initial statement is just deleted,it's obvious, that they retracted it for some reason.
If you write something publicly and someone reacts publicly, editing the initial statement (with an ill intent) can change the whole statement. If the initial statement is just deleted,it's obvious, that they retracted it for some reason.
I tried to better say what I meant in the previous reply
September 9, 2025 at 3:47 PM
I tried to better say what I meant in the previous reply
I think your mixing up what I'm meaning. Maybe it's because I'm not natively speaking English.. my points are:
I want to rely on public posts to not be secretly changed, so you can quote them.
If someone writes something they regret, they should have/retain their right to have it deleted.
I want to rely on public posts to not be secretly changed, so you can quote them.
If someone writes something they regret, they should have/retain their right to have it deleted.
September 9, 2025 at 3:46 PM
I think your mixing up what I'm meaning. Maybe it's because I'm not natively speaking English.. my points are:
I want to rely on public posts to not be secretly changed, so you can quote them.
If someone writes something they regret, they should have/retain their right to have it deleted.
I want to rely on public posts to not be secretly changed, so you can quote them.
If someone writes something they regret, they should have/retain their right to have it deleted.
I did not bring in the surveillance topic at all, because I don't see or assume a connection to the discussed topic.
And you still didn't provide any explanation, where you get that connection.
But your statement, that every surveillance must be justified, I agree with completely.
And you still didn't provide any explanation, where you get that connection.
But your statement, that every surveillance must be justified, I agree with completely.
September 9, 2025 at 3:43 PM
I did not bring in the surveillance topic at all, because I don't see or assume a connection to the discussed topic.
And you still didn't provide any explanation, where you get that connection.
But your statement, that every surveillance must be justified, I agree with completely.
And you still didn't provide any explanation, where you get that connection.
But your statement, that every surveillance must be justified, I agree with completely.
You assume, that an edit history of public posts makes it easier to surveil people.
That's the assumption I don't support or get.
That's the assumption I don't support or get.
September 9, 2025 at 3:36 PM
You assume, that an edit history of public posts makes it easier to surveil people.
That's the assumption I don't support or get.
That's the assumption I don't support or get.
As mentioned, I don't want to surveil anyone. And my point is, that an edit history doesn't change anything for people who want to do that.
September 9, 2025 at 3:31 PM
As mentioned, I don't want to surveil anyone. And my point is, that an edit history doesn't change anything for people who want to do that.
You assume, my reasoning is pro surveillance. Which is completely the opposite from my view. I don't want to own anything from anyone on bluesky. I just want to rely on the fact, that bluesky does not allow it's user to alter history, so it can be quoted reliably.
September 9, 2025 at 3:29 PM
You assume, my reasoning is pro surveillance. Which is completely the opposite from my view. I don't want to own anything from anyone on bluesky. I just want to rely on the fact, that bluesky does not allow it's user to alter history, so it can be quoted reliably.
Plus you cannot avoid, that anyone records public posts and changes to it. That's why I really don't get you surveillance argument.
September 9, 2025 at 3:25 PM
Plus you cannot avoid, that anyone records public posts and changes to it. That's why I really don't get you surveillance argument.
A public post is something entirely different than a private conversation. If you allow editing posts without the reader noticing, links to bsky posts in press etc. would become completely unreliable. It's not just a missing "convenience" feature, it's a decision by bsky I fully understand.
September 9, 2025 at 3:23 PM
A public post is something entirely different than a private conversation. If you allow editing posts without the reader noticing, links to bsky posts in press etc. would become completely unreliable. It's not just a missing "convenience" feature, it's a decision by bsky I fully understand.
You just assumed my concern is to surveil people and called it dumb. And don't explain, why the only thing you see in an edit history, is surveillance. I don't get that point.
September 9, 2025 at 2:43 PM
You just assumed my concern is to surveil people and called it dumb. And don't explain, why the only thing you see in an edit history, is surveillance. I don't get that point.
Sorry, I thought you really wanted to argue about that, instead of just insulting other users.
My point is, that the abuse potential for editing posts without other people noticing something changed, is just too high imo.
My point is, that the abuse potential for editing posts without other people noticing something changed, is just too high imo.
September 9, 2025 at 2:34 PM
Sorry, I thought you really wanted to argue about that, instead of just insulting other users.
My point is, that the abuse potential for editing posts without other people noticing something changed, is just too high imo.
My point is, that the abuse potential for editing posts without other people noticing something changed, is just too high imo.
Without edit history, the potential to abuse this to alter conversations retrospectively is too big. As long as you are still able to delete posts completely, I don't get your argument or what it has to do with surveillance and facism.
September 9, 2025 at 2:08 PM
Without edit history, the potential to abuse this to alter conversations retrospectively is too big. As long as you are still able to delete posts completely, I don't get your argument or what it has to do with surveillance and facism.
I would rather like a feature to "revoke" a post, which marks it as revoked and links to the replacement. That way, the original post is still readable and we have a edit history.
September 9, 2025 at 6:19 AM
I would rather like a feature to "revoke" a post, which marks it as revoked and links to the replacement. That way, the original post is still readable and we have a edit history.
Wenn man das mit der Telekom vergleicht, echt fix!
Ich wurde letztens nach 2h Wartezeit darüber informiert, dass immer noch niemand da ist und die Hotline hat aufgelegt.
Ich wurde letztens nach 2h Wartezeit darüber informiert, dass immer noch niemand da ist und die Hotline hat aufgelegt.
August 27, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Wenn man das mit der Telekom vergleicht, echt fix!
Ich wurde letztens nach 2h Wartezeit darüber informiert, dass immer noch niemand da ist und die Hotline hat aufgelegt.
Ich wurde letztens nach 2h Wartezeit darüber informiert, dass immer noch niemand da ist und die Hotline hat aufgelegt.
Hab letzte Woche im Schnitt 21.000/Tag und bin ein bisschen stolz darauf
August 18, 2025 at 7:23 AM
Hab letzte Woche im Schnitt 21.000/Tag und bin ein bisschen stolz darauf
Congrats!
I really enjoy the transparency of the python team in general, but also your feed here :)
I really enjoy the transparency of the python team in general, but also your feed here :)
July 29, 2025 at 6:29 AM
Congrats!
I really enjoy the transparency of the python team in general, but also your feed here :)
I really enjoy the transparency of the python team in general, but also your feed here :)
Ist das schon kulturelle Aneignung?
July 24, 2025 at 6:07 AM
Ist das schon kulturelle Aneignung?