ResistOrGoHome
resistorgohome.bsky.social
ResistOrGoHome
@resistorgohome.bsky.social
Dad, stepdad, grandpa. Retired clinical pharmacist, local historic preservationist, blues fan, sometime gadfly.
Waiting for Chocolate-covered Glazed Donut Holes.
My favorite 😋
January 4, 2026 at 9:35 PM
Unfortunately, there are deaf ears in most of Congress and no incentive to self-indict in DOJ 🤷
January 4, 2026 at 9:32 PM
Point!
January 4, 2026 at 9:28 PM
🧐 Motive, Means, and Opportunity.
OK, yer clear, Joe
January 4, 2026 at 9:25 PM
You’re really begging to get looked at by the PBI, Patel’s Bureau of Investigation, aren’t you?
January 4, 2026 at 8:43 PM
You’re auditioning to be every repuglican’s spokesperson, right? Good one.
January 4, 2026 at 8:42 PM
You’re right and it’s a sorry situation.

Used to be that your government representative knew about EVERYTHING in range. That’s how they represented your interests. Stay on top of it all. Take input and opinion from constituents.

Now deniability is the common Get-out-of-jail-free card.
January 4, 2026 at 8:38 PM
Ooh! That’ll mean a lotta little assholes in the midlands.
January 4, 2026 at 8:33 PM
Now THERE’S the knowingly bogus headline we’d like blasted all over 🤣
January 4, 2026 at 8:31 PM
Castrated?! Funny thing is, they didn’t feel a thing. Yet.
January 4, 2026 at 8:29 PM
Your reply is a good one to illustrate the complexities of telecom in this century versus the last. All the more reason to discuss (preferably at the Congressional level) revisiting the CDA.
January 4, 2026 at 8:24 PM
Why would a huge news source or broadcaster cave to a questionable suit by the sewer-in-chief (sic) when they have same expected Constitutional protection? I don’t know that logic but see its effect.

Go, BBC, go!
January 4, 2026 at 8:15 PM
I could be naive, but hope removing platform immunity for vile content might nudge the Xs, Truth.socials, TikTok’s, instagrams, & others into some circumspection about what they permit to be posted.

I’m not current on this but recall stories of AI cos being sued for their bots’ harmful suggestions
January 4, 2026 at 7:50 PM
Is it too soon to revisit efforts to revoke Section 230 of the 1996 Communication Decency Act, which allows media platforms to claim separation from vile content because they are only the publishers, not creators, of the dreck?
January 4, 2026 at 7:25 PM
I give highest praise to PBS and Politico for their reporting. They’re among the best. I still sense they struggle to avoid using the economical word, LIE, to describe presidential errors, fabrications, misspeaks, and exaggerations, all without evidence.

Please report the truth in common parlance.
January 4, 2026 at 7:17 PM
All hail His Madnesty!

He hath deposed a lesser monarch with aims to rape those sovereign natural resources under guise of shielding us from imagined menace while spreading democracy and peace.

He hath loosed the fateful lightning of his terrible swift sword.

Glory, glory, hallelujah!
January 3, 2026 at 5:20 PM
It sounds like the Chief Justice, who few of us know but give blind grace on account of his position, has written a superficial piece devoid of depth or context. I must ask, “Was ChatGPT involved?”
January 3, 2026 at 4:47 AM
I can see it now.

In an attempt to keep eyeballs on himself, fat man ups the ante. Proposes a PROTESTER SWAP. He’ll send rounded up liberal protesters from blue cities in return the US will accept Iranian protesters. Crazy to all but him 😵‍💫
January 2, 2026 at 9:14 PM
Something about the definition of in sanity …
January 2, 2026 at 5:54 PM
Agreed reposting can amplify odious message or rally blue troops. 2-edged sword. Anybody figured how do 1 without the other?

Another amp is the action. Fat man ramps up effort for shock news effect. Deport migrants<interdict Caribb boats<sink boats<send Navy<drone land attacks. What’s next = news
January 1, 2026 at 3:31 AM
I agree with you. (And I like the X-crement term) It’s a dilemma. To repost or not to repost, that is the question:
Whether ‘tis nobler in the mind …

Reposting amps his megaphone but alerts us of another slander.

The media face the same; skip it or broadcast for FOMO. Does it become complicity?
December 31, 2025 at 9:32 PM
The fat man has never been known as a reliable speller. Maybe he spelled this convict’s name 2 ways to increase chance of correctness. Choosing PETTERS at the end, does this make him a “Petterphile”?
December 31, 2025 at 9:05 PM
Mr. Bump, any chance you’d allow your words as a sign posted at the entrance of all restaurants, nice or not?
December 31, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Yes, of course. Undeniable to all with unbiased senses of sight & hearing who saw the insurrection attempt unfold in real time. We knew what we were watching. No amount of admin gaslighting will change that. History books will be written; the video stands as record. There are more of us than them.
December 31, 2025 at 8:13 PM