@nanobubbles.bsky.social very interesting! Considering this

@ElenLeFoll discussed this previously with @lakens and @EvoMRI - would be a good practice for ethics committees to put out at least some metadata for the reviews they provide

@ElenLeFoll I believe @annayahprosser has worked on this

@casperalbers.nl thank you for setting the stage for open science in the Netherlands - identifying software sovereignty and the public good nature of science as fundamental values we should keep in mind today and in the future

other sources of data and research designs. The project is funded by the TDCC SSH scheme of NWO (Dutch Research Council).

With our team including Cristian Mesquida, Max Littel, and Jakub Werner we are very much looking forward to introduce our plans for the future development of Research […]

of the transparency and methodological quality, so that they can evaluate it in a fair and transparent manner. It will lower the burden on reviewers and editors, and reduce errors in published research.

@debruine and @lakens have developed the software backbone and the first modules, geared […]

- the manuscript includes 2 references that are not in the reference list (author 1, 2023; author 2, 2012), and 1 reference in the reference list that is not in the manuscript (author 3, 1996). You may want to get those fixed."

We are working on a system that processes pdf files and provides an […]

- no references to retracted studies.

Here are some things you could do to improve the manuscript:
- the link to the repository on the OSF is private - you may want to set it to public;
- a power analysis is missing - you may want to consider including a sample size justification;
- there's a […]

The second one with Max Littel, Marlou Ramaekers, and Stephanie Koolen-Maas, PhD on the Science of Philanthropy Cleanup https://osf.io/749kt - focusing on reliable findings from independent replications of interventions to increase philanthropy. Such interventions are increasingly important as […]