@rencedraws.bsky.social
I mean they did have a warrant to seize documents. Do they really still believe that “securing documents” them in a bathroom is reasonable?
December 24, 2025 at 2:01 PM
I mean they did have a warrant to seize documents. Do they really still believe that “securing documents” them in a bathroom is reasonable?
I thought that their whole anti-TG thing was about “keeping men out of women’s bathrooms.”
It’s almost like things aren’t actually what they say they are…
It’s almost like things aren’t actually what they say they are…
December 24, 2025 at 1:55 PM
I thought that their whole anti-TG thing was about “keeping men out of women’s bathrooms.”
It’s almost like things aren’t actually what they say they are…
It’s almost like things aren’t actually what they say they are…
“Dom just said, you know what, ask for forgiveness later, we’re going to just start this,” she said.
Narrator: “They were in fact, not forgiven.”
Narrator: “They were in fact, not forgiven.”
December 23, 2025 at 2:03 PM
“Dom just said, you know what, ask for forgiveness later, we’re going to just start this,” she said.
Narrator: “They were in fact, not forgiven.”
Narrator: “They were in fact, not forgiven.”
Do what I’m doing. Assume every non-victim name that is redacted is “Trump” until they prove otherwise.
December 22, 2025 at 1:25 AM
Do what I’m doing. Assume every non-victim name that is redacted is “Trump” until they prove otherwise.
Until proven otherwise, I’m just going to read every non-victim’s redacted name in those files as “Donald J. Trump”.
December 21, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Until proven otherwise, I’m just going to read every non-victim’s redacted name in those files as “Donald J. Trump”.
Depends on how radical the change. If it is interchangeable (eg roll v point buy) it goes inline. If it’s introducing, say, optional ‘feats’, it’s its own section as adding feats changes the balance of the game, typically.
December 19, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Depends on how radical the change. If it is interchangeable (eg roll v point buy) it goes inline. If it’s introducing, say, optional ‘feats’, it’s its own section as adding feats changes the balance of the game, typically.
Optional rules get their own section, rules variations get put into the text.
Thus three ways to make a PC or roll init are in their respective sections because they are different methods of achieving the same outcome, but turning on “dark mode” and cranking up the difficulty changes the game.
Thus three ways to make a PC or roll init are in their respective sections because they are different methods of achieving the same outcome, but turning on “dark mode” and cranking up the difficulty changes the game.
December 19, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Optional rules get their own section, rules variations get put into the text.
Thus three ways to make a PC or roll init are in their respective sections because they are different methods of achieving the same outcome, but turning on “dark mode” and cranking up the difficulty changes the game.
Thus three ways to make a PC or roll init are in their respective sections because they are different methods of achieving the same outcome, but turning on “dark mode” and cranking up the difficulty changes the game.
The man projects so much TDE that he must have an innie.
December 18, 2025 at 1:48 PM
The man projects so much TDE that he must have an innie.
Buying votes is so 2024.
They started issuing what appears to be illegal orders back in Sept.
This is likely buying something far more sinister than that.
They started issuing what appears to be illegal orders back in Sept.
This is likely buying something far more sinister than that.
December 18, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Buying votes is so 2024.
They started issuing what appears to be illegal orders back in Sept.
This is likely buying something far more sinister than that.
They started issuing what appears to be illegal orders back in Sept.
This is likely buying something far more sinister than that.
“Conceptually, all of the ingredients for a really cool game were there except the hearts of the developers,” said the same guy who is pushing the team to use Gen AI.
December 17, 2025 at 1:25 AM
“Conceptually, all of the ingredients for a really cool game were there except the hearts of the developers,” said the same guy who is pushing the team to use Gen AI.
This just in: “Old man confused by other people existing in ‘his space.’”
Film at 11.
Film at 11.
December 15, 2025 at 1:44 PM
This just in: “Old man confused by other people existing in ‘his space.’”
Film at 11.
Film at 11.
He’s hallucinating worse than AI at this point.
Not what you want in the frontman.
Not what you want in the frontman.
December 14, 2025 at 1:49 PM
He’s hallucinating worse than AI at this point.
Not what you want in the frontman.
Not what you want in the frontman.
True since about 1840.*
*brought to you by the Industrial Revolution. Available now in all locations.
*brought to you by the Industrial Revolution. Available now in all locations.
December 7, 2025 at 5:39 PM
True since about 1840.*
*brought to you by the Industrial Revolution. Available now in all locations.
*brought to you by the Industrial Revolution. Available now in all locations.
They were well aware. The issue is whose opinion he was parroting.
So he was this many days old when he learned that…
…sorry, nope. I got nothing.
So he was this many days old when he learned that…
…sorry, nope. I got nothing.
December 5, 2025 at 8:49 PM
They were well aware. The issue is whose opinion he was parroting.
So he was this many days old when he learned that…
…sorry, nope. I got nothing.
So he was this many days old when he learned that…
…sorry, nope. I got nothing.
So, you going to pay his pension if he stays and gets booted without the benefits he’s earned over 40 years?
Didn’t think so.
Armchair quarterbacking costs keyboard commandos nothing. Staying would have cost him everything.
Didn’t think so.
Armchair quarterbacking costs keyboard commandos nothing. Staying would have cost him everything.
December 5, 2025 at 5:56 PM
So, you going to pay his pension if he stays and gets booted without the benefits he’s earned over 40 years?
Didn’t think so.
Armchair quarterbacking costs keyboard commandos nothing. Staying would have cost him everything.
Didn’t think so.
Armchair quarterbacking costs keyboard commandos nothing. Staying would have cost him everything.
Isn’t she the one that came out with the song “Manchild” declaring that she likes her “men all incompetent”?
There’s some serious mixed messaging going on here.
There’s some serious mixed messaging going on here.
December 3, 2025 at 1:53 PM
Isn’t she the one that came out with the song “Manchild” declaring that she likes her “men all incompetent”?
There’s some serious mixed messaging going on here.
There’s some serious mixed messaging going on here.
Well the US military now seems to have a new protocol for that, apparently.
December 3, 2025 at 1:21 PM
Well the US military now seems to have a new protocol for that, apparently.
It’s very clear what they were doing: Documenting for history that he has neither a heart, nor guts.
December 3, 2025 at 2:29 AM
It’s very clear what they were doing: Documenting for history that he has neither a heart, nor guts.
It was somewhere in early C3 when they abandoned that “nerdy-ass voice actors playing DnD” schtick.
They’re a corp now with contractual obligations and a payroll to meet.
The days when they they’re willing to walk away like they did with that Wendy’s RPG 1-shot are likely well gone.
They’re a corp now with contractual obligations and a payroll to meet.
The days when they they’re willing to walk away like they did with that Wendy’s RPG 1-shot are likely well gone.
December 2, 2025 at 1:29 PM
It was somewhere in early C3 when they abandoned that “nerdy-ass voice actors playing DnD” schtick.
They’re a corp now with contractual obligations and a payroll to meet.
The days when they they’re willing to walk away like they did with that Wendy’s RPG 1-shot are likely well gone.
They’re a corp now with contractual obligations and a payroll to meet.
The days when they they’re willing to walk away like they did with that Wendy’s RPG 1-shot are likely well gone.
Based on this title, I would have to question what, exactly, was expended in approving it.
Cause on the surface this seems like nothing but a brand-diluting cash grab.
Cause on the surface this seems like nothing but a brand-diluting cash grab.
November 28, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Based on this title, I would have to question what, exactly, was expended in approving it.
Cause on the surface this seems like nothing but a brand-diluting cash grab.
Cause on the surface this seems like nothing but a brand-diluting cash grab.
Something that motivates, rouses, or encourages.
To pressure, intimidate, or force (someone) into doing something
So those two sentences are synonymous to you?
Sure, buddy.
You do seem to have a desired outcome in this conversation, irrespective of what you claim.
To pressure, intimidate, or force (someone) into doing something
So those two sentences are synonymous to you?
Sure, buddy.
You do seem to have a desired outcome in this conversation, irrespective of what you claim.
November 27, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Something that motivates, rouses, or encourages.
To pressure, intimidate, or force (someone) into doing something
So those two sentences are synonymous to you?
Sure, buddy.
You do seem to have a desired outcome in this conversation, irrespective of what you claim.
To pressure, intimidate, or force (someone) into doing something
So those two sentences are synonymous to you?
Sure, buddy.
You do seem to have a desired outcome in this conversation, irrespective of what you claim.
Thar’s literally the game they signed up for. There is a difference between incentive and coercion.
I mean, dictionaries exist.
I mean, dictionaries exist.
November 27, 2025 at 2:47 PM
Thar’s literally the game they signed up for. There is a difference between incentive and coercion.
I mean, dictionaries exist.
I mean, dictionaries exist.
For me, no. But everyone is not me.
But it immediately tells me, right up front. Who the game is designed for. Which is helpful.
For example, if it’s more condescending than informative, I’ll generally pass. (Not naming names)
But it immediately tells me, right up front. Who the game is designed for. Which is helpful.
For example, if it’s more condescending than informative, I’ll generally pass. (Not naming names)
November 27, 2025 at 1:53 PM
For me, no. But everyone is not me.
But it immediately tells me, right up front. Who the game is designed for. Which is helpful.
For example, if it’s more condescending than informative, I’ll generally pass. (Not naming names)
But it immediately tells me, right up front. Who the game is designed for. Which is helpful.
For example, if it’s more condescending than informative, I’ll generally pass. (Not naming names)
If them declining a plot point derails your game, you’re railroading them.
November 27, 2025 at 1:47 PM
If them declining a plot point derails your game, you’re railroading them.
The original tern referred to the railroads using force to buy land that they could not fairly buy.
If you offer your players something, and they refuse, that’s where railroading begins. If you coerce them or force them into a line of action, you’re railroading them.
If you offer your players something, and they refuse, that’s where railroading begins. If you coerce them or force them into a line of action, you’re railroading them.
November 27, 2025 at 1:47 PM
The original tern referred to the railroads using force to buy land that they could not fairly buy.
If you offer your players something, and they refuse, that’s where railroading begins. If you coerce them or force them into a line of action, you’re railroading them.
If you offer your players something, and they refuse, that’s where railroading begins. If you coerce them or force them into a line of action, you’re railroading them.