Remi
@remipanjo.bsky.social
Clay W.
MtG/EDH | Banjo 🪕 | Composer | Red Pandas | 15~20k Go/Baduk ⚪️⚫️
31 | Married
Formerly EDHpanda on old site
Pfp: 🖌 rueghost.bsky.social
Banner: 🖌 katnay.bksy.social
MtG/EDH | Banjo 🪕 | Composer | Red Pandas | 15~20k Go/Baduk ⚪️⚫️
31 | Married
Formerly EDHpanda on old site
Pfp: 🖌 rueghost.bsky.social
Banner: 🖌 katnay.bksy.social
My current 5-drop commander is *incredibly* polarizing at a table
November 14, 2025 at 9:24 PM
My current 5-drop commander is *incredibly* polarizing at a table
Rolled credits with these goobers. I was very pleasantly surprised every step of the way with the game and to say it smashed my expectations is an understatement (given how cratered my expectations of gamefreak are these days).
It has a few issues but it was very enjoyable!
#pokemonza
It has a few issues but it was very enjoyable!
#pokemonza
November 2, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Rolled credits with these goobers. I was very pleasantly surprised every step of the way with the game and to say it smashed my expectations is an understatement (given how cratered my expectations of gamefreak are these days).
It has a few issues but it was very enjoyable!
#pokemonza
It has a few issues but it was very enjoyable!
#pokemonza
November 1, 2025 at 3:38 AM
This little mans is totally a sphinx
October 29, 2025 at 3:37 AM
This little mans is totally a sphinx
I'm like, 99% sure someone else will have already made this, but
October 27, 2025 at 2:06 AM
I'm like, 99% sure someone else will have already made this, but
I see that now! I tuned in right on the tail end and only saw the Rhys/Beseech/DRS graphic and didn't know they'd already discussed it
October 21, 2025 at 6:38 PM
I see that now! I tuned in right on the tail end and only saw the Rhys/Beseech/DRS graphic and didn't know they'd already discussed it
Got this AMAZING piece of my LARP character done by the lovely Merlin ( @dhscomix.com )! [redacted], the raccoon druid, means well but has a bit of a chaotic streak.
This month's game may see him Find Out to April's Fuck Around, where the last mod of the weekend ended with some impulsive arson...
This month's game may see him Find Out to April's Fuck Around, where the last mod of the weekend ended with some impulsive arson...
September 26, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Got this AMAZING piece of my LARP character done by the lovely Merlin ( @dhscomix.com )! [redacted], the raccoon druid, means well but has a bit of a chaotic streak.
This month's game may see him Find Out to April's Fuck Around, where the last mod of the weekend ended with some impulsive arson...
This month's game may see him Find Out to April's Fuck Around, where the last mod of the weekend ended with some impulsive arson...
Just a pretty standard wah!
September 15, 2025 at 10:50 PM
Just a pretty standard wah!
Hiya!
I hope whomever reads this has a fantastic weekend despite all of the crazy happening!
I hope whomever reads this has a fantastic weekend despite all of the crazy happening!
September 6, 2025 at 3:54 AM
Hiya!
I hope whomever reads this has a fantastic weekend despite all of the crazy happening!
I hope whomever reads this has a fantastic weekend despite all of the crazy happening!
Her nightly @cirquedusoleil.bsky.social rehearsal is going stupendously (this is why we can't have nice curtains). Truly the next great silks performer
#cat
#catsofbluesky
#cat
#catsofbluesky
August 17, 2025 at 3:11 AM
Her nightly @cirquedusoleil.bsky.social rehearsal is going stupendously (this is why we can't have nice curtains). Truly the next great silks performer
#cat
#catsofbluesky
#cat
#catsofbluesky
![Lili Resolves. Bolt Her? [R]
Instant
This spell deals 3 damage to any target. If this spell targets a planeswalker that entered the battlefield this turn with starting loyalty 3 or less, instead destroy that permanent and counter all activated abilities of that permanent.
"Wait, what do you mean you can activate it first?"](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:kx74bhcfg33okxvvn2o3bo4e/bafkreigmqvxo7rcrylx6qnwhsxgugayezzv7nzy37erdvfybary3o6flfi@jpeg)
Conversely, why is the ruling for the last ability on The Royal Scions different?
Based on the above principal, if I have a Teferi's Ageless Insight and draw multiple sets of four, it feels like it should trigger each time.
Question popped up in a Discord and got me curious.
Based on the above principal, if I have a Teferi's Ageless Insight and draw multiple sets of four, it feels like it should trigger each time.
Question popped up in a Discord and got me curious.
August 13, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Conversely, why is the ruling for the last ability on The Royal Scions different?
Based on the above principal, if I have a Teferi's Ageless Insight and draw multiple sets of four, it feels like it should trigger each time.
Question popped up in a Discord and got me curious.
Based on the above principal, if I have a Teferi's Ageless Insight and draw multiple sets of four, it feels like it should trigger each time.
Question popped up in a Discord and got me curious.
don't reflexively trigger.
So Ajani really reads, "When you create a 2/1 white Cat Warrior creature token this way, [damage]."
Does that extrapolate out to, say, Faebloom Trick?
"When you create two 1/1 Faeries this way, [tap]." So that doubling season would double the tap triggers a la Ajani?
So Ajani really reads, "When you create a 2/1 white Cat Warrior creature token this way, [damage]."
Does that extrapolate out to, say, Faebloom Trick?
"When you create two 1/1 Faeries this way, [tap]." So that doubling season would double the tap triggers a la Ajani?
August 13, 2025 at 1:51 PM
don't reflexively trigger.
So Ajani really reads, "When you create a 2/1 white Cat Warrior creature token this way, [damage]."
Does that extrapolate out to, say, Faebloom Trick?
"When you create two 1/1 Faeries this way, [tap]." So that doubling season would double the tap triggers a la Ajani?
So Ajani really reads, "When you create a 2/1 white Cat Warrior creature token this way, [damage]."
Does that extrapolate out to, say, Faebloom Trick?
"When you create two 1/1 Faeries this way, [tap]." So that doubling season would double the tap triggers a la Ajani?
@wotcmatt.bsky.social
Hey Matt, question about reflexives -
Based on the comp rules and the gatherer entries for Ajani, Nacatl Pariah, they should be read as "When you [specified action this way], do this," with it triggering for each time. And if you didn't do the action due to a replacement, you
Hey Matt, question about reflexives -
Based on the comp rules and the gatherer entries for Ajani, Nacatl Pariah, they should be read as "When you [specified action this way], do this," with it triggering for each time. And if you didn't do the action due to a replacement, you
![603.12. A resolving spell or ability may allow or instruct a player to take an action and create a triggered ability that triggers “when [a player] [does or doesn’t]” take that action or “when [something happens] this way.” These reflexive triggered abilities follow the rules for delayed triggered abilities (see rule 603.7), except that they’re checked immediately after being created and trigger based on whether the trigger event or events occurred earlier during the resolution of the spell or ability that created them.
Example: Heart-Piercer Manticore has an ability that reads “When Heart-Piercer Manticore enters, you may sacrifice another creature. When you do, Heart-Piercer Manticore deals damage equal to that creature’s power to any target.” The reflexive triggered ability triggers only when you sacrifice another creature due to the original triggered ability, and not if you sacrifice a creature for any other reason.
603.12a Normally, if the trigger event or events occur multiple times during the resolution of the spell or ability that created it, the reflexive triggered ability will trigger once for each of those times. However, if a resolving spell or ability includes a choice to pay a cost “any number of times” and creates a triggered ability that triggers “when [a player] pays [that cost] one or more times,” paying that cost one or more times causes the reflexive triggered ability to trigger only once.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:kx74bhcfg33okxvvn2o3bo4e/bafkreiaqbgzao73grlok25n63vhbbs62zqvyzbmuhy4jln7qyiui5eu2i4@jpeg)
August 13, 2025 at 1:51 PM
@wotcmatt.bsky.social
Hey Matt, question about reflexives -
Based on the comp rules and the gatherer entries for Ajani, Nacatl Pariah, they should be read as "When you [specified action this way], do this," with it triggering for each time. And if you didn't do the action due to a replacement, you
Hey Matt, question about reflexives -
Based on the comp rules and the gatherer entries for Ajani, Nacatl Pariah, they should be read as "When you [specified action this way], do this," with it triggering for each time. And if you didn't do the action due to a replacement, you
Nah, Gix died in Planeswalker.
It was K'rrik. Same book as I thought, just earlier. Later, it's Radiant that pulls out the powerstones and then gets disintegrated when Urza re-forms.
It was K'rrik. Same book as I thought, just earlier. Later, it's Radiant that pulls out the powerstones and then gets disintegrated when Urza re-forms.
August 10, 2025 at 3:11 PM
Nah, Gix died in Planeswalker.
It was K'rrik. Same book as I thought, just earlier. Later, it's Radiant that pulls out the powerstones and then gets disintegrated when Urza re-forms.
It was K'rrik. Same book as I thought, just earlier. Later, it's Radiant that pulls out the powerstones and then gets disintegrated when Urza re-forms.
PRAISE BE TO THE ORIGINAL GHALTA (and one of the first rares I owned)
August 8, 2025 at 2:28 PM
PRAISE BE TO THE ORIGINAL GHALTA (and one of the first rares I owned)
Maybe I'm too entrenched, but it makes sense that the turn action the step is named after is the first thing to happen in that step?
You still have to declare not blocking if you're going to Magickally block with a Fog Patch or Mirror March. It doesn't retroactively cancel the trigger on the stack
You still have to declare not blocking if you're going to Magickally block with a Fog Patch or Mirror March. It doesn't retroactively cancel the trigger on the stack
August 6, 2025 at 1:40 AM
Maybe I'm too entrenched, but it makes sense that the turn action the step is named after is the first thing to happen in that step?
You still have to declare not blocking if you're going to Magickally block with a Fog Patch or Mirror March. It doesn't retroactively cancel the trigger on the stack
You still have to declare not blocking if you're going to Magickally block with a Fog Patch or Mirror March. It doesn't retroactively cancel the trigger on the stack
July 27, 2025 at 7:37 PM