Reggie
@reggiecyoung.bsky.social
Doing stuff and things. Chief of Staff. Lawyer. Writer.
Fintech. Public lands. Various other itinerant projects.
Fintech. Public lands. Various other itinerant projects.
Reposted by Reggie
Sen. Durbin, why do we need to repeal 230 to do this?
230 is about content. You're (rightly) focused on platforms' *practices*.
FTC UDAP authority might be enough. Or you could give them UDAAP authority (like the CFPB).
Repealing 230 won't solve this, only give incumbents more of an oligopoly.
230 is about content. You're (rightly) focused on platforms' *practices*.
FTC UDAP authority might be enough. Or you could give them UDAAP authority (like the CFPB).
Repealing 230 won't solve this, only give incumbents more of an oligopoly.
March 7, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Sen. Durbin, why do we need to repeal 230 to do this?
230 is about content. You're (rightly) focused on platforms' *practices*.
FTC UDAP authority might be enough. Or you could give them UDAAP authority (like the CFPB).
Repealing 230 won't solve this, only give incumbents more of an oligopoly.
230 is about content. You're (rightly) focused on platforms' *practices*.
FTC UDAP authority might be enough. Or you could give them UDAAP authority (like the CFPB).
Repealing 230 won't solve this, only give incumbents more of an oligopoly.
Sen. Durbin, why do we need to repeal 230 to do this?
230 is about content. You're (rightly) focused on platforms' *practices*.
FTC UDAP authority might be enough. Or you could give them UDAAP authority (like the CFPB).
Repealing 230 won't solve this, only give incumbents more of an oligopoly.
230 is about content. You're (rightly) focused on platforms' *practices*.
FTC UDAP authority might be enough. Or you could give them UDAAP authority (like the CFPB).
Repealing 230 won't solve this, only give incumbents more of an oligopoly.
March 7, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Sen. Durbin, why do we need to repeal 230 to do this?
230 is about content. You're (rightly) focused on platforms' *practices*.
FTC UDAP authority might be enough. Or you could give them UDAAP authority (like the CFPB).
Repealing 230 won't solve this, only give incumbents more of an oligopoly.
230 is about content. You're (rightly) focused on platforms' *practices*.
FTC UDAP authority might be enough. Or you could give them UDAAP authority (like the CFPB).
Repealing 230 won't solve this, only give incumbents more of an oligopoly.
Highly topical theme of "faith in the underlying thing X, while losing faith in the institutions of X"
Also, the climax speech rhetorical twist is SO GOOD. And topical. "We're arguing over which past version of the Church is best. But the Church is whatever we make it next."
Also, the climax speech rhetorical twist is SO GOOD. And topical. "We're arguing over which past version of the Church is best. But the Church is whatever we make it next."
February 16, 2025 at 4:37 PM
Highly topical theme of "faith in the underlying thing X, while losing faith in the institutions of X"
Also, the climax speech rhetorical twist is SO GOOD. And topical. "We're arguing over which past version of the Church is best. But the Church is whatever we make it next."
Also, the climax speech rhetorical twist is SO GOOD. And topical. "We're arguing over which past version of the Church is best. But the Church is whatever we make it next."