The year is 2049. We have reverted to pre-feudal slave agriculture as all trade relations and complex economic arrangements have ended. Time to complain about Bernie Bros and Chapo Traphouse while I toil in the turnip fields under the lash.

Felix has turned people to the right, but only by not liking their replies or riffing with them

The electorate loves genocide, thank you for your input

Now I'm the one who has been on here for too long lol. I'll DM you instead if that's alright.

All the families that were expelled during the Nakba against international law. I don't think it *has to* mean it ceases to exist, but it would mean that it couldn't continue to be built on Jewish supremacy.

I won't get into the granularity of it then, but just to respond to the last bit - most advocates for Israel think it ceases to exist if refugees are allowed to return. By that standard, yes it should cease to exist. If it still exists while allowing that, that's a different matter.

Most Israelis don't like Netanyahu, but for reasons that are orthogonal to genocide. I'm for a single democratic state. If you'd like I can get more into the problems with a 2 state but don't want to bombard you with it if you don't want it.

Sorry this only works if you're weird, not for being anti zionist

Based on the Israeli flag in bio I'm pretty sure it's not the relevance of the subject but the fact that you are on the other side of it that is the actual issue for you here.

I do insist that people who want votes from me oppose the genocide happening now at least once, especially when they have been fanatically supportive of the president who is enthusiastically pro genocide

It's not being a dick to expect people running for office to have the bare minimum amount of humanity necessary to be publicly against a genocide we are funding and arming.

Nothing happens, except that it's good to make winning impossible for candidates who are indifferent to genocide. I am not saying the Minnesota house can end genocide.

To clarify - I don't expect the office to have really any influence over it, but why would you commit to not even trying to do anything or even comment on it at all?

He said in an interview that he would never talk about it. So really anything would be more than what he is doing. I don't expect him to be able to do anything but why would I vote for someone who won't even try to use whatever leverage they would have in office?

But you do know how to hide quite effectively when asked about genocide.

Wallfacer Cait

You took every opportunity you could to antagonize the left on every issue, made a deliberate choice to ignore genocide, and then you blame the left for not wanting to elect you. Just incredible.