I don't disagree. It's nothing new though just the technology and platform types are new.

It was Fox News since the 90s, the Sun since the 80s, the Daily Mail for 120 years.

They don't create that audience, they feed off it.

It's a bit of a chicken/egg question. Did GB News design its content knowing what this audience were looking for?

I don't think GB News made them, it reflects them back at the rest of us.

It's also because they are completely and exclusively obsessed by it and they have an inexhaustible desire to bang on about it, while normal people like to talk and think about different thing or even just chill and not think about much at all

They are always 'on'.

Oh wow, I was at that game! Fun day.

Frankly the aim of this season now should be to finish as high as possible and hopefully secure a Champions League place (not a certainty)...and then be more strategic and effective in next window.

You can't go from those Forest/PSv showings to champagne football. We needed to stem the bleeding, and I'm not sure that part is even complete yet. And Leeds should be a formality...not a worry. But this is where we are.

I questioned the Isak pursuit and am not the only one (price, his attitude, the over-prioritisation) and okay, maybe we had no option with Diaz but Harvey? Even Nunez (but that is admittedly hindsight).

Wirtz was a glamour buy. Nice but we did need a CB more.

Well, I guess the question might be...DID they add quality? Or did they flog players we could have done with, kept those who are done and added 'expensive flavour of the months'. Our transfer policy is has been shambolic for ages.