fair point, they only have 1/3rd but theyre also the biggest company of the three, so they probably have the leverage. It took until Legends ZA to even hit the quality mark they should have had at the start of the switch 1's life span. But as is they leave it alone and just rake in the profits

they operate so differently from nintendo's first party strategy that I find it hard to believe they bother to give much input on the pokemon games at all as long as their cut from pokemon company profits is good

unless we're blaming creatures inc, one of the few things nintendo does well is give their games the people and time needed to make a good game, it wouldnt make sense for them to choose to vote against allocating enough funds to such a profitable property considering their first party games

gamefreak is not owned by them though, the pokemon games arent their fault. Nintendo has a lot of problems these days, especially on anti-consumer practices, but thats one they didnt have a hand in. Though they probably are behind the crusade against pokemon fan games

Get arch and join in the suffering that is installing the damn thing :p

i have a dream

I'm not fluent enough to post there IMO, still too early, and most of my friends speak english, other european languages, and mandarin, not nihongo/japanese, and I like sharing things I make with my friends