Yeah, I get that. I've recently talked about "what would make academia better" with some friends within it, and there definitively were some ideas that felt great eventually but potentially harmful at this point in time.

For grabbing their attention, maybe focus the title/thumbnail on the cool pattern itself, if that's even possible. For what it's worth, I think I did first find you through your narwhal video.

Admittedly, I'm not in the biz, but I feel like bad faith actors will always be able to find a way to take something out of context. Being honest and approachable for people engaging with you honestly might be the best you can hope for.

If I get you right, then I think you could get around that through a section explaining how in science in general and with the wikipedia specifically "self-correcting" and "constantly changing" are linked.