UNLV Debate Team
@rebeldebate.bsky.social
University of Nevada Las Vegas
The first collegiate debate team (possibly any team) on Blue Sky. (6/23/23).
Support our team! https://www.unlv.edu/debate/support
The first collegiate debate team (possibly any team) on Blue Sky. (6/23/23).
Support our team! https://www.unlv.edu/debate/support
It dates back to an argument with the Sophists and Plato, and you seem to be on Plato's side. Totally valid and its not for everyone.
October 16, 2025 at 6:26 PM
It dates back to an argument with the Sophists and Plato, and you seem to be on Plato's side. Totally valid and its not for everyone.
Upon looking so do I! Lol.
We'd agree that something like twitch stream debate bros are mostly bad for democracy. But competitive debate is the best way to foster critical thinking in an academic setting.
We'd agree that something like twitch stream debate bros are mostly bad for democracy. But competitive debate is the best way to foster critical thinking in an academic setting.
September 28, 2025 at 11:45 AM
Upon looking so do I! Lol.
We'd agree that something like twitch stream debate bros are mostly bad for democracy. But competitive debate is the best way to foster critical thinking in an academic setting.
We'd agree that something like twitch stream debate bros are mostly bad for democracy. But competitive debate is the best way to foster critical thinking in an academic setting.
How can we change beliefs if we dont engage with the other side?
September 28, 2025 at 11:42 AM
How can we change beliefs if we dont engage with the other side?
We dont believe that is true at all. Meaningful discovery is exactly what the function of inquiry means.
September 28, 2025 at 11:42 AM
We dont believe that is true at all. Meaningful discovery is exactly what the function of inquiry means.
But we wouldn't write of competitive debate so quickly. Even though we often argue what we dont believe it helps us think about the other side to strengthen our actual positions.
Often debaters think one thing is true but their research and evidence helps to change their minds, which can be good 2!
Often debaters think one thing is true but their research and evidence helps to change their minds, which can be good 2!
helps.to
September 28, 2025 at 10:50 AM
But we wouldn't write of competitive debate so quickly. Even though we often argue what we dont believe it helps us think about the other side to strengthen our actual positions.
Often debaters think one thing is true but their research and evidence helps to change their minds, which can be good 2!
Often debaters think one thing is true but their research and evidence helps to change their minds, which can be good 2!
Hi! We agree with a lot of this. Argument has an advocacy function AND an inquiry function. We overlook the education and knowledge production too much. 1/2
September 28, 2025 at 10:49 AM
Hi! We agree with a lot of this. Argument has an advocacy function AND an inquiry function. We overlook the education and knowledge production too much. 1/2
We just having fun out here.
September 24, 2025 at 4:42 PM
We just having fun out here.
Hey now wait a minute here....
September 24, 2025 at 4:26 PM
Hey now wait a minute here....
I mean who says no?
August 24, 2025 at 4:56 PM
I mean who says no?
If a person were debating in favor of fascism they'd be promptly kicked out of a debate round.
Even us pros know certain things arent debatable.
Even us pros know certain things arent debatable.
July 29, 2025 at 5:52 AM
If a person were debating in favor of fascism they'd be promptly kicked out of a debate round.
Even us pros know certain things arent debatable.
Even us pros know certain things arent debatable.