Ray
@rayearth.bsky.social
Nerd (Anime, Fantasy, Comics, you name it). Quietly political. Just some guy, yaknow? He/Him. I play games. I am not a Gamer.
Oh you didn't know? Yeah, he was the guy behind the Oculus.
December 19, 2025 at 10:29 PM
Oh you didn't know? Yeah, he was the guy behind the Oculus.
What the fuck is coming out of your mouth?
December 16, 2025 at 3:23 PM
What the fuck is coming out of your mouth?
It's fine for some. Maybe not for others. This is such a weird thing to be making some blanket judgment on. Why do people care how other people's kids get to school?
December 16, 2025 at 1:55 PM
It's fine for some. Maybe not for others. This is such a weird thing to be making some blanket judgment on. Why do people care how other people's kids get to school?
It's so cute you think that you're making a point. But I expect nothing less from someone like you.
December 13, 2025 at 2:14 PM
It's so cute you think that you're making a point. But I expect nothing less from someone like you.
we should, in fact, celebrate when a company does the bare minimum of immediately firing someone for being openly racist towards a customer, and there doesn't need to be a 'workers-involved process' in that
December 13, 2025 at 4:56 AM
we should, in fact, celebrate when a company does the bare minimum of immediately firing someone for being openly racist towards a customer, and there doesn't need to be a 'workers-involved process' in that
Oh, so you think it'll just be 'social media platforms'? Are you sure about that?
December 13, 2025 at 4:49 AM
Oh, so you think it'll just be 'social media platforms'? Are you sure about that?
No, it really isn't, and the fact that you don't know that is extremely telling.
December 13, 2025 at 2:22 AM
No, it really isn't, and the fact that you don't know that is extremely telling.
By the way, before you ask, yes I was in fact born 'before 230 existed' and I was also using the internet before then, so, you can put that particularly weird superiority trick to rest.
December 13, 2025 at 2:21 AM
By the way, before you ask, yes I was in fact born 'before 230 existed' and I was also using the internet before then, so, you can put that particularly weird superiority trick to rest.
The Internet existed before 230, but was not nearly what it is now. Do YOU have brain damage? Or do you just have a thick vibrating dildo on your high horse that keeps you up there?
December 13, 2025 at 2:20 AM
The Internet existed before 230, but was not nearly what it is now. Do YOU have brain damage? Or do you just have a thick vibrating dildo on your high horse that keeps you up there?
You're one to talk about not having facts or evidence, you ghoul.
December 13, 2025 at 2:18 AM
You're one to talk about not having facts or evidence, you ghoul.
Going to see Maverick, something like 3-4 weeks after it came out, with a couple friends, the late-night showing. We were completely alone in the theater. It was amazing and kind of surreal at the same time.
December 13, 2025 at 2:06 AM
Going to see Maverick, something like 3-4 weeks after it came out, with a couple friends, the late-night showing. We were completely alone in the theater. It was amazing and kind of surreal at the same time.
How do your pre-230 idealistic notions work in the world of instantaneous, ubiquitous information transfer?
December 13, 2025 at 1:55 AM
How do your pre-230 idealistic notions work in the world of instantaneous, ubiquitous information transfer?
Who defines who is lying, and who is merely misinformed? Who defines when someone is arguing in bad faith versus good faith?
December 13, 2025 at 1:54 AM
Who defines who is lying, and who is merely misinformed? Who defines when someone is arguing in bad faith versus good faith?
So, a non-answer? That's about what I expected.
December 13, 2025 at 1:53 AM
So, a non-answer? That's about what I expected.
Fuck you, don't do this.
December 13, 2025 at 1:28 AM
Fuck you, don't do this.
Who is the arbiter of 'good faith'?
December 13, 2025 at 1:09 AM
Who is the arbiter of 'good faith'?
You'll continue to blather about 'measurable goals', about some ineffability that is, what, unfair to Hakeem Jeffries, as if holding him to standards is because of his race, not his performance, and never engage with the topic. You are not doing the Democratic Party any favors.
December 11, 2025 at 12:16 AM
You'll continue to blather about 'measurable goals', about some ineffability that is, what, unfair to Hakeem Jeffries, as if holding him to standards is because of his race, not his performance, and never engage with the topic. You are not doing the Democratic Party any favors.
You've proven yourself, Suanne Laqueur, so very white as a woman, to be incapable of engaging in actual conversation. I'd ask you this question: Why should I be satisfied with Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, and the Democratic Party as a whole? But I know your answer will be vapid.
December 11, 2025 at 12:16 AM
You've proven yourself, Suanne Laqueur, so very white as a woman, to be incapable of engaging in actual conversation. I'd ask you this question: Why should I be satisfied with Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, and the Democratic Party as a whole? But I know your answer will be vapid.
They're about letting the GOP fearmonger without any pushback, about quiescently accepting appointments that have proven to be disastrous, about being unable to come together as a unified force.
December 11, 2025 at 12:16 AM
They're about letting the GOP fearmonger without any pushback, about quiescently accepting appointments that have proven to be disastrous, about being unable to come together as a unified force.
misrepresenting what they say in order to make yourself feel good about your 'lack of racism'. But none of my criticisms of him or the Democrats are ABOUT race. They're about not being able to stoke a fire in people, about tossing minority groups under the bus to try and appeal to bigots.
December 11, 2025 at 12:16 AM
misrepresenting what they say in order to make yourself feel good about your 'lack of racism'. But none of my criticisms of him or the Democrats are ABOUT race. They're about not being able to stoke a fire in people, about tossing minority groups under the bus to try and appeal to bigots.
And yet, I still know what I think is bad leadership when I see it. Whether that's Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, or anyone else.
You trying to frame it as some fucking racial thing are doing your best to wipe away criticism. You're putting words into people's mouths and
You trying to frame it as some fucking racial thing are doing your best to wipe away criticism. You're putting words into people's mouths and
December 11, 2025 at 12:16 AM
And yet, I still know what I think is bad leadership when I see it. Whether that's Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, or anyone else.
You trying to frame it as some fucking racial thing are doing your best to wipe away criticism. You're putting words into people's mouths and
You trying to frame it as some fucking racial thing are doing your best to wipe away criticism. You're putting words into people's mouths and
Oh, no! You're quote-posting me to put me on blast!
You're so fucking stupid, Suanne, it's no wonder you can't comprehend this, as a completely unserious person.
Leadership isn't a measurable goal in politics. It is, by it's nature, nebulous and ambiguous. There isn't a scorecard to reference.
You're so fucking stupid, Suanne, it's no wonder you can't comprehend this, as a completely unserious person.
Leadership isn't a measurable goal in politics. It is, by it's nature, nebulous and ambiguous. There isn't a scorecard to reference.
December 11, 2025 at 12:16 AM
Oh, no! You're quote-posting me to put me on blast!
You're so fucking stupid, Suanne, it's no wonder you can't comprehend this, as a completely unserious person.
Leadership isn't a measurable goal in politics. It is, by it's nature, nebulous and ambiguous. There isn't a scorecard to reference.
You're so fucking stupid, Suanne, it's no wonder you can't comprehend this, as a completely unserious person.
Leadership isn't a measurable goal in politics. It is, by it's nature, nebulous and ambiguous. There isn't a scorecard to reference.
Oh, sorry. I was doing more important things than jousting with an online political warrior, like getting work done and getting a haircut. But no, I'm not going to arbitrarily name 'ten things' I think they've done wrong. You're not defining the terms here. I refuse your childish 'name 10 things'.
December 10, 2025 at 11:45 PM
Oh, sorry. I was doing more important things than jousting with an online political warrior, like getting work done and getting a haircut. But no, I'm not going to arbitrarily name 'ten things' I think they've done wrong. You're not defining the terms here. I refuse your childish 'name 10 things'.
And, most importantly, I'm not criticizing them out of hate. Because this two-party system is broken and despite all their faults they are still INFINITELY preferable to the GOP and I need them to make that clear to the people who don't believe that.
December 10, 2025 at 11:43 PM
And, most importantly, I'm not criticizing them out of hate. Because this two-party system is broken and despite all their faults they are still INFINITELY preferable to the GOP and I need them to make that clear to the people who don't believe that.
"meet us in the middle". The Democratic Party is a lot like Charlie Brown in that respect. I'm criticizing them for, as a party, not recognizing the ways the landscape has changed and attempting to beat down the voices in their party who HAVE.
December 10, 2025 at 11:43 PM
"meet us in the middle". The Democratic Party is a lot like Charlie Brown in that respect. I'm criticizing them for, as a party, not recognizing the ways the landscape has changed and attempting to beat down the voices in their party who HAVE.