@raven2010.bsky.social
I don't believe that the two survivors were trying to complete their journey.
I'm sure he doesn't believe it either.
How? Without gasoline and a working motor, they weren't going to get very far. It is 1,400 miles to Florida.
I'm sure he doesn't believe it either.
How? Without gasoline and a working motor, they weren't going to get very far. It is 1,400 miles to Florida.
December 4, 2025 at 4:45 PM
I don't believe that the two survivors were trying to complete their journey.
I'm sure he doesn't believe it either.
How? Without gasoline and a working motor, they weren't going to get very far. It is 1,400 miles to Florida.
I'm sure he doesn't believe it either.
How? Without gasoline and a working motor, they weren't going to get very far. It is 1,400 miles to Florida.
More. She doesn't serve the Kremlin. Greta Thunberg isn't even liked by the Russians. "Russian President Vladimir Putin has been critical of Thunberg, suggesting in 2019 that she might be manipulated to serve others' interests and calling her "poorly informed".
November 1, 2025 at 9:50 PM
More. She doesn't serve the Kremlin. Greta Thunberg isn't even liked by the Russians. "Russian President Vladimir Putin has been critical of Thunberg, suggesting in 2019 that she might be manipulated to serve others' interests and calling her "poorly informed".
It is real simple. This troll is lying about Greta Thunberg and the Kremlin. A simple Google search proves that. "Thunberg has spoken out against the Russian invasion of Ukraine, highlighting the environmental destruction caused by the war and calling for accountability for Russia's actions.
November 1, 2025 at 9:48 PM
It is real simple. This troll is lying about Greta Thunberg and the Kremlin. A simple Google search proves that. "Thunberg has spoken out against the Russian invasion of Ukraine, highlighting the environmental destruction caused by the war and calling for accountability for Russia's actions.
No, Just no.
There are multiple screaming Red flags with this guy.
He is a huge risk not worth taking.
Too many Democratic party elected officials turned out to be closet Republicans such as Manchin, Sinema, or Tulsi Gabbard.
Unnecessary risk.
It is a big world, find another good candidate.
There are multiple screaming Red flags with this guy.
He is a huge risk not worth taking.
Too many Democratic party elected officials turned out to be closet Republicans such as Manchin, Sinema, or Tulsi Gabbard.
Unnecessary risk.
It is a big world, find another good candidate.
October 23, 2025 at 6:07 PM
No, Just no.
There are multiple screaming Red flags with this guy.
He is a huge risk not worth taking.
Too many Democratic party elected officials turned out to be closet Republicans such as Manchin, Sinema, or Tulsi Gabbard.
Unnecessary risk.
It is a big world, find another good candidate.
There are multiple screaming Red flags with this guy.
He is a huge risk not worth taking.
Too many Democratic party elected officials turned out to be closet Republicans such as Manchin, Sinema, or Tulsi Gabbard.
Unnecessary risk.
It is a big world, find another good candidate.
We are.
So what can we do right now?
It is not like I or anyone can stop those construction machines from destroying the East wing of the Whitehouse.
I was at the No Kings demonstration on Saturday with 7 million other people.
So what can we do right now?
It is not like I or anyone can stop those construction machines from destroying the East wing of the Whitehouse.
I was at the No Kings demonstration on Saturday with 7 million other people.
October 22, 2025 at 2:06 PM
We are.
So what can we do right now?
It is not like I or anyone can stop those construction machines from destroying the East wing of the Whitehouse.
I was at the No Kings demonstration on Saturday with 7 million other people.
So what can we do right now?
It is not like I or anyone can stop those construction machines from destroying the East wing of the Whitehouse.
I was at the No Kings demonstration on Saturday with 7 million other people.
The Violence Project: Using a restrictive definition of mass shooting, their database includes only one transgender mass shooter since 1966. This was the 2023 shooter at a Christian school in Nashville, who was a transgender man.
So 2 Trans shooters total since 1966, Nashville and Minnesota.
So 2 Trans shooters total since 1966, Nashville and Minnesota.
September 5, 2025 at 8:04 PM
The Violence Project: Using a restrictive definition of mass shooting, their database includes only one transgender mass shooter since 1966. This was the 2023 shooter at a Christian school in Nashville, who was a transgender man.
So 2 Trans shooters total since 1966, Nashville and Minnesota.
So 2 Trans shooters total since 1966, Nashville and Minnesota.
The "Denver shooter" is also not Trans.
That is James Holmes and the killings were in Aurora,
Colorado not Denver.
Wherever that photo montage came from, it is highly inaccurate and useless.
That is James Holmes and the killings were in Aurora,
Colorado not Denver.
Wherever that photo montage came from, it is highly inaccurate and useless.
September 5, 2025 at 7:54 PM
The "Denver shooter" is also not Trans.
That is James Holmes and the killings were in Aurora,
Colorado not Denver.
Wherever that photo montage came from, it is highly inaccurate and useless.
That is James Holmes and the killings were in Aurora,
Colorado not Denver.
Wherever that photo montage came from, it is highly inaccurate and useless.
That photo montage of supposed Trans mass killers is full of outright lies.
Google
No, the Uvalde shooter, Salvador Ramos, was not transgender. The claim that he was transgender was a baseless rumor that spread online following the shooting in May 2022.
No, the Uvalde shooter, Salvador Ramos, was not transgender. The claim that he was transgender was a baseless rumor that spread online following the shooting in May 2022.
September 5, 2025 at 7:47 PM
That photo montage of supposed Trans mass killers is full of outright lies.
Google
No, the Uvalde shooter, Salvador Ramos, was not transgender. The claim that he was transgender was a baseless rumor that spread online following the shooting in May 2022.
No, the Uvalde shooter, Salvador Ramos, was not transgender. The claim that he was transgender was a baseless rumor that spread online following the shooting in May 2022.