@rauld01.bsky.social
Reposted
We try comparing apples to apples whenever we can, available data allowing. 🍎
See exhibit A, Shasta Co., CA: The 2024 Republican Presidential candidate winning the county, statistically speaking, this looks normal.
See exhibit A, Shasta Co., CA: The 2024 Republican Presidential candidate winning the county, statistically speaking, this looks normal.
September 14, 2025 at 3:32 PM
We try comparing apples to apples whenever we can, available data allowing. 🍎
See exhibit A, Shasta Co., CA: The 2024 Republican Presidential candidate winning the county, statistically speaking, this looks normal.
See exhibit A, Shasta Co., CA: The 2024 Republican Presidential candidate winning the county, statistically speaking, this looks normal.
Reposted
You want the truth? So do we. Let's count the papers.
How? Let's fund these court actions.
See our site to learn how to help get involved.
This truth isn't going to reveal itself.
How? Let's fund these court actions.
See our site to learn how to help get involved.
This truth isn't going to reveal itself.
September 9, 2025 at 9:08 PM
You want the truth? So do we. Let's count the papers.
How? Let's fund these court actions.
See our site to learn how to help get involved.
This truth isn't going to reveal itself.
How? Let's fund these court actions.
See our site to learn how to help get involved.
This truth isn't going to reveal itself.
Reposted
The key takeaway from Mebane's analysis is a statistically significant estimation of potentially anomalous votes, with the most concerning indicators in Philadelphia county, and predominately linked to election-day voting.
May 12, 2025 at 2:59 PM
The key takeaway from Mebane's analysis is a statistically significant estimation of potentially anomalous votes, with the most concerning indicators in Philadelphia county, and predominately linked to election-day voting.