Tak - og vildt at landbrugets arealbehov er så omfattende, at det bare suger til sig. Og at vi tillader det.

Ikke særlig uddybende, nej. Eks. intet belæg for: “...men juletræer vokser som regel på steder, der ellers ville blive brugt af landbruget…”.

Men er arealforbrug og det deraf afledte tryk på hjemmehørende arter ikke stadig et ret stort problem?

Den største 💊 man kan tage er fem min på x for at finde ud af, at det nazistiske tankegods lever i bedste velgående

Hvortil

My first comment vs your first comment 😤😤

Not really. Our ancestors didn’t have to account for the correlation between economic growth and global climactic destabilisation. The sheer complexity of climate change as an organisational issue cannot be compared to anything from the past.

Was lovely seeing you again :)))

Mensch ich auch

I’m danish you muffin

Actually beautiful cover, love me some graphic maps

You clearly don’t understand my comment. I’m saying that democracies can historically slide into authoritarian and that the US is not except from that rule. And yea, the GOP anno 2024 has an authoritarian streak, they’re literally denying election results.

But that’s the historical problem with democratic backsliding: Electorates don’t learn, they just slide further along the lines of authoritarianism.