Analytics at presagegroup.com | PhD Epidemiology | #julialang #rstats | publications at www.randy.pub | GitHub @rdboyes, currently working on https://github.com/TidierOrg/TidierPlots.jl | 🐦@randyboyes
I typically just use `factor(x)` but if you want names other than TRUE and FALSE I don't think you're getting a cleaner solution than what you have, unless you prefer something like `factor(c(TRUE, FALSE)) |> fct_recode(Yes = "TRUE", No = "FALSE")`
November 17, 2025 at 11:18 AM
I typically just use `factor(x)` but if you want names other than TRUE and FALSE I don't think you're getting a cleaner solution than what you have, unless you prefer something like `factor(c(TRUE, FALSE)) |> fct_recode(Yes = "TRUE", No = "FALSE")`
would have been extremely relevant. Nothing beats R for quick visualizations, and doing ML in anything other than Python is painful. Right tool for the right task, basically, and the syntax for whatever language you use most is going to look best
(Unless that is python, ew)
November 14, 2025 at 11:15 AM
would have been extremely relevant. Nothing beats R for quick visualizations, and doing ML in anything other than Python is painful. Right tool for the right task, basically, and the syntax for whatever language you use most is going to look best
I think “data science” is too broad for there to be such a thing as “a good language for data science” in general. He says performance considerations are secondary, but when I was doing my PhD, I had R code that would take multiple days to run, and the 100x speedup you can get in Julia …
November 14, 2025 at 11:12 AM
I think “data science” is too broad for there to be such a thing as “a good language for data science” in general. He says performance considerations are secondary, but when I was doing my PhD, I had R code that would take multiple days to run, and the 100x speedup you can get in Julia …
Isn’t this just regular recursion? Either way, I don’t think you’re missing anything from a practical point of view - writing a loop is almost always going to be clearer
November 6, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Isn’t this just regular recursion? Either way, I don’t think you’re missing anything from a practical point of view - writing a loop is almost always going to be clearer
You've already extracted a lot of the actual "learning" benefit - I guess the question is how much you need the piece of paper. Do you want to be an academic (more to the point - do you *only* want to be an academic)? I finished mine years late and running on spite; I don't think it was all upside
November 3, 2025 at 1:50 PM
You've already extracted a lot of the actual "learning" benefit - I guess the question is how much you need the piece of paper. Do you want to be an academic (more to the point - do you *only* want to be an academic)? I finished mine years late and running on spite; I don't think it was all upside
It’s so good - I’ll be shocked if it doesn’t win. The only thing that brought it down a little for me was act 3 felt a little weak compared to the first 2
October 31, 2025 at 9:33 AM
It’s so good - I’ll be shocked if it doesn’t win. The only thing that brought it down a little for me was act 3 felt a little weak compared to the first 2
The only thing that forces me to keep a windows 11 drive is office (for work, it’s not really optional) - ironically if the web versions of office weren’t such garbage I would be able to cut ties completely
October 24, 2025 at 5:50 PM
The only thing that forces me to keep a windows 11 drive is office (for work, it’s not really optional) - ironically if the web versions of office weren’t such garbage I would be able to cut ties completely
I look forward to this every year, but I usually get distracted from it around day 12 anyway with holiday commitments. Good change, and thanks for the puzzles!
October 23, 2025 at 10:28 PM
I look forward to this every year, but I usually get distracted from it around day 12 anyway with holiday commitments. Good change, and thanks for the puzzles!