@rando1111.bsky.social
Here is a screenshot of the preveding thread. As you can see you were pwned from pillar to post
January 15, 2026 at 9:57 PM
Here is a screenshot of the preveding thread. As you can see you were pwned from pillar to post
But maybe you dont share those concerns. Maybe you arent alarmed abt Trump turning my country into a kakistocracy. Maybe you think the trans BS is more important that our democracy surviving, or our POTUS using a family crypto "investment" vehicle to launder bribes.
January 14, 2026 at 6:13 PM
But maybe you dont share those concerns. Maybe you arent alarmed abt Trump turning my country into a kakistocracy. Maybe you think the trans BS is more important that our democracy surviving, or our POTUS using a family crypto "investment" vehicle to launder bribes.
Have u read the Dentons (law firm) strategy paper for enacting trans-friendly policies? They candidly endorse all manner of deceptive strategies. Works for a while, then you get blowback bc ppl respond poorly to subterfuge
July 13, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Have u read the Dentons (law firm) strategy paper for enacting trans-friendly policies? They candidly endorse all manner of deceptive strategies. Works for a while, then you get blowback bc ppl respond poorly to subterfuge
Just think about your approach to these debates. I dont think you guys would argue this way if you knew how harmful it was for the goals you have, which can only be accomplished through politics
July 13, 2025 at 6:36 PM
Just think about your approach to these debates. I dont think you guys would argue this way if you knew how harmful it was for the goals you have, which can only be accomplished through politics
Parenthetical is correct. Most ppl are not genocidal. But very false to say "most ppl" support "trans rights" as u define them. So why lie? Why delude yourself? What purpose does it serve? It is so self-defeating!
July 13, 2025 at 5:29 AM
Parenthetical is correct. Most ppl are not genocidal. But very false to say "most ppl" support "trans rights" as u define them. So why lie? Why delude yourself? What purpose does it serve? It is so self-defeating!
Thats fine but can you explain this phenomenon? Like, sincerely?
July 13, 2025 at 5:19 AM
Thats fine but can you explain this phenomenon? Like, sincerely?
Why lie? And not only lie but emphasize your dishonesty by using words like "remotely" to preface your lie? It is such bad politics i truly do wonder about why it is so widespread
July 13, 2025 at 4:35 AM
Why lie? And not only lie but emphasize your dishonesty by using words like "remotely" to preface your lie? It is such bad politics i truly do wonder about why it is so widespread
Unfortunately im not Peter Thiel
July 3, 2025 at 3:06 AM
Unfortunately im not Peter Thiel
Religious observance has a very moderating influence on the politics of conservatives. OP is dumb. The real issue is Trump increasing the GOP share of secular and nonpracticing voters, bc secularism is growing a LOT.
July 2, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Religious observance has a very moderating influence on the politics of conservatives. OP is dumb. The real issue is Trump increasing the GOP share of secular and nonpracticing voters, bc secularism is growing a LOT.
The refusal to frame the issue honestly is most evident when they hijack the language of the civil rights movement and refuse to "see" what differentiates their cause. You see it every day on this site. Like look at these exchanges
June 22, 2025 at 11:54 AM
The refusal to frame the issue honestly is most evident when they hijack the language of the civil rights movement and refuse to "see" what differentiates their cause. You see it every day on this site. Like look at these exchanges
Its not remotely close to being representative of the electorate and on cultural nonsense doesnt even reflect the median dem. Walz is trying to find a lane for '28. Someone who came out against trans inclusion in girls sports would find a wider one
June 14, 2025 at 2:47 AM
Its not remotely close to being representative of the electorate and on cultural nonsense doesnt even reflect the median dem. Walz is trying to find a lane for '28. Someone who came out against trans inclusion in girls sports would find a wider one
The problem is you guys live in a fantasy world. You won't concede basic premises like "trans athletes in womens' sports tend to have physical advantages" over the competition. Then normies see Lia Thomas or this person and wonder: dishonesty? Delusion? Both?
June 8, 2025 at 1:31 PM
The problem is you guys live in a fantasy world. You won't concede basic premises like "trans athletes in womens' sports tend to have physical advantages" over the competition. Then normies see Lia Thomas or this person and wonder: dishonesty? Delusion? Both?
Lmao this has fuckall to do with athletic "gifts"
June 2, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Lmao this has fuckall to do with athletic "gifts"
I have no fucking clue. Habit, tradition, custom. Not a sport so if i were czar i would be happy to integrate trans dart throwers and chess players. Doesn't have a fuckn thing to do with this:
June 2, 2025 at 2:11 PM
I have no fucking clue. Habit, tradition, custom. Not a sport so if i were czar i would be happy to integrate trans dart throwers and chess players. Doesn't have a fuckn thing to do with this:
This is your post, racist
June 2, 2025 at 6:41 AM
This is your post, racist
Maybe youre drinking or something lol
June 2, 2025 at 6:40 AM
Maybe youre drinking or something lol