Remember when he said he'd bring all the jobs back to Americans?

I wouldn't get hung up about it.

Agreed; but I would rather people eat not based on any income. I'm pushing for a moneyless society, where needs are met because they're needs, not because you justify your existence in labor to society.

I want us to stop wasting time counting beans/dollars/bitcoin and use that labor to make a better world.

Hopefully they do start to look more into why they might feel guilty about having some extra cash, and put it to good use. We vote with our dollars, against people with a lot of "votes" in their favor.

You absolutely don't owe anyone the work to understand it, and it's on them to do the homework. That being said, sometimes it's a good place for people to start.

I wish that could be the case, but I've known people who look at it the other way; they somehow consider themselves rich while struggling to make ends meet, and so any anti-rich rhetoric also targets *them,* of course it takes mental gymnastics to accomplish this.

The current administration has proven to be more emotional than any woman at any part of her cycle.

It allows a cascade effect of using such egregious amounts of money to make more of it, basically getting paid in beans for counting beans.

What is rich though? Are we talking 100k? Probably not. 500k? Getting there... 1 Millie? That's pretty well to do... But we have people with one thousand times a million and more. Even if it was ethically accumulated (there's no ethical consumption under capitalism), by removing it from circulation-

Just @ me if you're going to attack me, lmao; Anime character with tuberculosis.

It clearly shows the difference between the income ranges; it's a class difference problem.

Worst part is, the people you want to suffer under this accelerationism, won't even notice it as they move/retire to other countries. Or work from there.

I don't feel like making a 14 year old choose between killing me for my storage of food for his sister, or eating his sister.