Raihan Alam
banner
raihanalam.bsky.social
Raihan Alam
@raihanalam.bsky.social
PhD student at UCSD Rady | First Generation | Interested in Morality, Punishment, and Restorative Justice
https://sites.google.com/view/raihan-alam/home
So how do we restore cooperation? Positive experiences aren’t enough. Even when punishment was perfectly prosocial (Exp 3), cooperation never fully recovered. Only when paid punishers could only punish selfish behavior (Exp 4) was cooperation restored.
August 19, 2025 at 6:50 PM
And partly because dictators and receivers saw the system differently. Receivers trusted paid punishers more, viewed dictators as selfish, and prioritized prosocial punishment. Dictators were more skeptical of paid punishers and concerned about being treated fairly (Exp 8)
August 19, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Partly because of lay theories: most receivers assumed that paying punishers would increase cooperation (Study 7).
August 19, 2025 at 6:50 PM
When we asked receivers whether they preferred games with incentivized or non-incentivized punishers, most chose incentivized. Ironically, this cut their own payments by ~20% (Study 6). Why did they choose to incentivize punishers?
August 19, 2025 at 6:50 PM
In our follow-up experiments, we found that cooperation collapsed because people trusted incentivized punishers less and that the introduction of financial incentives shifted norms from cooperation to self-interest (Exp 9).
August 19, 2025 at 6:50 PM
When we incentivized punishers, the classic effect flipped: instead of boosting cooperation, the introduction of punishers decreased it across both one-shot (Exp 1) and repeated games (Exp 2).
August 19, 2025 at 6:50 PM
In our games, a dictator (Player 1) decides whether to share with a receiver (Player 2). A punisher (Player 3), after witnessing the dictator's decision, can decide to remove money from the dictator. In some conditions, punishers earned a small bonus each time they punished.
August 19, 2025 at 6:50 PM
What explains the disconnect between our economic games and the real-world? We theorized that one reason is that punishers often have incentives to punish. These ulterior motives can undermine the communicative function of punishment and weaken its ability to foster cooperation.
August 19, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Lastly, we hope this data contributes to the ongoing debate and the growing bipartisan consensus to limit stock trading by members of Congress.
February 26, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Couldn't have done this without @unusualwhales.bsky.social great reporting on the subject! Check out their report for 2024 which we used as our experimental manipulation: unusualwhales.com/congress-tra...
February 26, 2025 at 5:15 PM