@quizzicalaxolotl.bsky.social
This guy..... definitely the half billionaire should tell the poor they need to save more :)
Oh, and Huggy-Bear Higgins is wrong btw. The average is at the most half of the 4k he claims.
What a peach.
Oh, and Huggy-Bear Higgins is wrong btw. The average is at the most half of the 4k he claims.
What a peach.
October 31, 2025 at 11:44 PM
This guy..... definitely the half billionaire should tell the poor they need to save more :)
Oh, and Huggy-Bear Higgins is wrong btw. The average is at the most half of the 4k he claims.
What a peach.
Oh, and Huggy-Bear Higgins is wrong btw. The average is at the most half of the 4k he claims.
What a peach.
Even when he's talking about being rated poorly unfairly, he can't help but inflate himself far beyond reality.
'third best president'
Yeah.... most people think you're the worst jackass. Quote that.
'third best president'
Yeah.... most people think you're the worst jackass. Quote that.
October 22, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Even when he's talking about being rated poorly unfairly, he can't help but inflate himself far beyond reality.
'third best president'
Yeah.... most people think you're the worst jackass. Quote that.
'third best president'
Yeah.... most people think you're the worst jackass. Quote that.
That dick in the white house.
October 22, 2025 at 2:29 PM
That dick in the white house.
This in a nutshell.
I don't know if Trump really cares, either. If he could have ICE and the military without congress, of course he would.
I don't know if Trump really cares, either. If he could have ICE and the military without congress, of course he would.
October 8, 2025 at 9:29 PM
This in a nutshell.
I don't know if Trump really cares, either. If he could have ICE and the military without congress, of course he would.
I don't know if Trump really cares, either. If he could have ICE and the military without congress, of course he would.
Lol.
This guy - not much of a point listening to his answers - he'll bald-faced lie at the drop of a hat.
What a complete tool.
This guy - not much of a point listening to his answers - he'll bald-faced lie at the drop of a hat.
What a complete tool.
October 1, 2025 at 11:36 AM
Lol.
This guy - not much of a point listening to his answers - he'll bald-faced lie at the drop of a hat.
What a complete tool.
This guy - not much of a point listening to his answers - he'll bald-faced lie at the drop of a hat.
What a complete tool.
Yep.
Because, of course.
Want to bet HR won't be hearing of this? Or any legal body? Because he's currently manhandling the legal's body.
Because, of course.
Want to bet HR won't be hearing of this? Or any legal body? Because he's currently manhandling the legal's body.
September 26, 2025 at 8:00 PM
Yep.
Because, of course.
Want to bet HR won't be hearing of this? Or any legal body? Because he's currently manhandling the legal's body.
Because, of course.
Want to bet HR won't be hearing of this? Or any legal body? Because he's currently manhandling the legal's body.
If you're a company who advertises with any of these stations - consider placing your ads elsewhere.
If you live in any of these areas - feel free to call advertisers on these channels and explain that you won't be using their company because they advertise with sinclair.
If you live in any of these areas - feel free to call advertisers on these channels and explain that you won't be using their company because they advertise with sinclair.
September 24, 2025 at 2:45 AM
If you're a company who advertises with any of these stations - consider placing your ads elsewhere.
If you live in any of these areas - feel free to call advertisers on these channels and explain that you won't be using their company because they advertise with sinclair.
If you live in any of these areas - feel free to call advertisers on these channels and explain that you won't be using their company because they advertise with sinclair.
And with Trump coincidentally just having extended the national guard's stay in LA through Nov 5th... what with California's gerrymandering to counter Texas' gerrymandering....
He'll absolutely attempt this - now or next Nov. Should make it well known to take the surprise factor away.Shame him now
He'll absolutely attempt this - now or next Nov. Should make it well known to take the surprise factor away.Shame him now
September 21, 2025 at 5:35 PM
And with Trump coincidentally just having extended the national guard's stay in LA through Nov 5th... what with California's gerrymandering to counter Texas' gerrymandering....
He'll absolutely attempt this - now or next Nov. Should make it well known to take the surprise factor away.Shame him now
He'll absolutely attempt this - now or next Nov. Should make it well known to take the surprise factor away.Shame him now
I guess the last thing I should be surprised at is Starbucks not supporting their employees when conservatives give their name as 'Charlie Kirk' on a drink order - just to make someone say the name out loud who doesn't want to.
You know - like assholes would do.
You know - like assholes would do.
September 20, 2025 at 8:52 PM
I guess the last thing I should be surprised at is Starbucks not supporting their employees when conservatives give their name as 'Charlie Kirk' on a drink order - just to make someone say the name out loud who doesn't want to.
You know - like assholes would do.
You know - like assholes would do.
No - they -are- allowed to criticize you.
They 'hit Trump' because you're belligerent, blatantly braggadocios, and the most inept, moron of a president this county has ever seen.
They 'hit Trump' because you're belligerent, blatantly braggadocios, and the most inept, moron of a president this county has ever seen.
September 18, 2025 at 8:47 PM
No - they -are- allowed to criticize you.
They 'hit Trump' because you're belligerent, blatantly braggadocios, and the most inept, moron of a president this county has ever seen.
They 'hit Trump' because you're belligerent, blatantly braggadocios, and the most inept, moron of a president this county has ever seen.
It really is. Especially now. Where did you see it being unanimous -pro- Israel?? Feel free to point me in that direction.
images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5...
images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5...
September 17, 2025 at 11:55 AM
It really is. Especially now. Where did you see it being unanimous -pro- Israel?? Feel free to point me in that direction.
images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5...
images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5...
This is so f-ing nuts. The administration doesn't want the world to see how much he gets booed?
Lol.
Lol.
September 8, 2025 at 2:17 AM
This is so f-ing nuts. The administration doesn't want the world to see how much he gets booed?
Lol.
Lol.
This doesn't make him look good in any capacity.
A. He's walking away from 'America', leaving it behind, and - apparently - he's left it in flames.
B. He's got a sour puss.
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GyrQ7SFWkAELCY-?format=jpg&name=900x900" alt="Image"/>
A. He's walking away from 'America', leaving it behind, and - apparently - he's left it in flames.
B. He's got a sour puss.
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GyrQ7SFWkAELCY-?format=jpg&name=900x900" alt="Image"/>
August 19, 2025 at 11:46 PM
This doesn't make him look good in any capacity.
A. He's walking away from 'America', leaving it behind, and - apparently - he's left it in flames.
B. He's got a sour puss.
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GyrQ7SFWkAELCY-?format=jpg&name=900x900" alt="Image"/>
A. He's walking away from 'America', leaving it behind, and - apparently - he's left it in flames.
B. He's got a sour puss.
<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GyrQ7SFWkAELCY-?format=jpg&name=900x900" alt="Image"/>
Cissy, huh.
I mean - do you -want- to argue? Because it sounds like you do.
No, it's not talking over you. Sorry. That's not what the phrase means.
I mean - do you -want- to argue? Because it sounds like you do.
No, it's not talking over you. Sorry. That's not what the phrase means.
August 5, 2025 at 2:07 AM
Cissy, huh.
I mean - do you -want- to argue? Because it sounds like you do.
No, it's not talking over you. Sorry. That's not what the phrase means.
I mean - do you -want- to argue? Because it sounds like you do.
No, it's not talking over you. Sorry. That's not what the phrase means.
Here, I'll help you, since you seem to be lazy and selective in your memory.
'how it does so matters'.
As well as her continued mentions of stopping the conflict.
But all the rest of that must be meaningless. I mean she did say she'd never stop arming..... oh wait.... she didn't.
'how it does so matters'.
As well as her continued mentions of stopping the conflict.
But all the rest of that must be meaningless. I mean she did say she'd never stop arming..... oh wait.... she didn't.
August 2, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Here, I'll help you, since you seem to be lazy and selective in your memory.
'how it does so matters'.
As well as her continued mentions of stopping the conflict.
But all the rest of that must be meaningless. I mean she did say she'd never stop arming..... oh wait.... she didn't.
'how it does so matters'.
As well as her continued mentions of stopping the conflict.
But all the rest of that must be meaningless. I mean she did say she'd never stop arming..... oh wait.... she didn't.
Here's the whole quote.
notice the 'how it does so matters' part.
I know you won't agree. You guys like to cherry-pick.
notice the 'how it does so matters' part.
I know you won't agree. You guys like to cherry-pick.
August 2, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Here's the whole quote.
notice the 'how it does so matters' part.
I know you won't agree. You guys like to cherry-pick.
notice the 'how it does so matters' part.
I know you won't agree. You guys like to cherry-pick.
Much of that was enacted after her campaign, and of course doesn't apply to this discussion.
For the items that preceded her campaign, about half were not being enforced.
But you're right. I was unaware of the few that were actually in place. Far less than the article you posted here though.
For the items that preceded her campaign, about half were not being enforced.
But you're right. I was unaware of the few that were actually in place. Far less than the article you posted here though.
August 2, 2025 at 5:16 AM
Much of that was enacted after her campaign, and of course doesn't apply to this discussion.
For the items that preceded her campaign, about half were not being enforced.
But you're right. I was unaware of the few that were actually in place. Far less than the article you posted here though.
For the items that preceded her campaign, about half were not being enforced.
But you're right. I was unaware of the few that were actually in place. Far less than the article you posted here though.
?
It describes it as similar to that setup, doesn't it?
They do stress repeatedly that Biden was staying loyal to Obama while presenting himself as the more receptive go-between.
So regarding the vp challanging the pres - that seems like that's not the case here.
It describes it as similar to that setup, doesn't it?
They do stress repeatedly that Biden was staying loyal to Obama while presenting himself as the more receptive go-between.
So regarding the vp challanging the pres - that seems like that's not the case here.
July 29, 2025 at 8:33 PM
?
It describes it as similar to that setup, doesn't it?
They do stress repeatedly that Biden was staying loyal to Obama while presenting himself as the more receptive go-between.
So regarding the vp challanging the pres - that seems like that's not the case here.
It describes it as similar to that setup, doesn't it?
They do stress repeatedly that Biden was staying loyal to Obama while presenting himself as the more receptive go-between.
So regarding the vp challanging the pres - that seems like that's not the case here.
Glad you brought it up. It was indeed monstrous.
Supports my point though.
Supports my point though.
July 24, 2025 at 5:31 AM
Glad you brought it up. It was indeed monstrous.
Supports my point though.
Supports my point though.
I'm getting 'Contact' flashbacks.
If the metadata was modified..... why do they have a minute missing in the video at all?
If the metadata was modified..... why do they have a minute missing in the video at all?
July 11, 2025 at 7:19 PM
I'm getting 'Contact' flashbacks.
If the metadata was modified..... why do they have a minute missing in the video at all?
If the metadata was modified..... why do they have a minute missing in the video at all?
What a fun game. Here's what appears to be your citation, in full. You'll note how it's not how you represented it with your truncated version.
July 10, 2025 at 4:17 PM
What a fun game. Here's what appears to be your citation, in full. You'll note how it's not how you represented it with your truncated version.
Hahahaha! Chuckle buckle fckle.
here, learn a little bit, if you dare.
www.jsonline.com/story/news/p...
here, learn a little bit, if you dare.
www.jsonline.com/story/news/p...
July 9, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Hahahaha! Chuckle buckle fckle.
here, learn a little bit, if you dare.
www.jsonline.com/story/news/p...
here, learn a little bit, if you dare.
www.jsonline.com/story/news/p...
I'd love more people to say this more often at news outlets.
'our job is not to protect trump's feelings'
'our job is not to protect trump's feelings'
![In an impassioned address, Tapper outlined Trump’s mode of attacking the messenger and branding outlets that reported the analysis as unpatriotic and disrespectful to the military.
The anchor reminded Trump of the Fourth Estate’s goal.
“Our obligation as journalists is not to praise President Trump, or protect his feelings, or to disparage him, or to praise him for that matter,” Tapper said. “Our obligation is to report facts. In this case, the fact is that an initial DIA intel assessment out of [Defense] Secretary Pete Hegseth’s own Pentagon exists. And that’s not going to change, no matter how many insults Trump levels.”](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:onlbi4g4aecrsacft3iqr6gn/bafkreifgxdrdhlzw6ilsolqpuoyh6pyhpykjjftaptcl7nnw7dbsvz7hli@jpeg)
June 26, 2025 at 12:34 PM
I'd love more people to say this more often at news outlets.
'our job is not to protect trump's feelings'
'our job is not to protect trump's feelings'