QuiqueCh
@quiquech.bsky.social
None of which applies to a confirmed cheating partner or an imaginary god. And funny because definition 6. clearly tells you that your jealous god has nothing to do with a cheating partner. A false equivalence and a red herring none the less.
June 9, 2025 at 2:25 PM
None of which applies to a confirmed cheating partner or an imaginary god. And funny because definition 6. clearly tells you that your jealous god has nothing to do with a cheating partner. A false equivalence and a red herring none the less.
If it's confirmed that your partner is having an affair then it's not jealousy anymore. Jealousy involves feelings of insecurity or fear. Whatever your analogy is still a false analogy and red herring.
June 7, 2025 at 3:30 AM
If it's confirmed that your partner is having an affair then it's not jealousy anymore. Jealousy involves feelings of insecurity or fear. Whatever your analogy is still a false analogy and red herring.
Isn't that more like a PR stunt? They're stupid but ... that stupid?
May 22, 2025 at 6:14 AM
Isn't that more like a PR stunt? They're stupid but ... that stupid?
I don't want to debate you, I was just curious about that one subject you mentioned.
April 3, 2025 at 9:16 AM
I don't want to debate you, I was just curious about that one subject you mentioned.
What's that one subject?
April 3, 2025 at 6:10 AM
What's that one subject?
TLDR: Christianity was born because Mary had an affair. ... And there's so much evidence for historical Jesus that OP blocks people ... 😂
March 26, 2025 at 3:21 AM
TLDR: Christianity was born because Mary had an affair. ... And there's so much evidence for historical Jesus that OP blocks people ... 😂
You're confusing scientific evidence with an argument from incredulity to justify your preconceived beliefs. While there are a lot of natural processes that we don't fully understand that doesn't mean that's evidence of a god.
March 24, 2025 at 3:28 AM
You're confusing scientific evidence with an argument from incredulity to justify your preconceived beliefs. While there are a lot of natural processes that we don't fully understand that doesn't mean that's evidence of a god.
There's no evidence of life on other planets and there's no evidence of the existence of any god. There are bio signatures that we expect to find if there's life but no one is rushing to say it's evidence of life. /1
March 24, 2025 at 3:27 AM
There's no evidence of life on other planets and there's no evidence of the existence of any god. There are bio signatures that we expect to find if there's life but no one is rushing to say it's evidence of life. /1
Translation : People lie.
March 16, 2025 at 10:12 PM
Translation : People lie.
And your point is? You keep showing that you don't understand science. Science is a self correcting process because it takes into account that humans are fallible. Every year nearly 2000 papers are retracted from science journals due to fraud.
March 16, 2025 at 8:58 AM
And your point is? You keep showing that you don't understand science. Science is a self correcting process because it takes into account that humans are fallible. Every year nearly 2000 papers are retracted from science journals due to fraud.
You should too because so far I've learned that you're not good at science as most of your posts try and fail to show that science is wrong. Also, I don't think it's a good idea to threaten people if they don't.
March 16, 2025 at 2:06 AM
You should too because so far I've learned that you're not good at science as most of your posts try and fail to show that science is wrong. Also, I don't think it's a good idea to threaten people if they don't.
Once again, your book is not proof, your book is the claim that needs to be proven. And so far, you've failed at that.
March 16, 2025 at 12:10 AM
Once again, your book is not proof, your book is the claim that needs to be proven. And so far, you've failed at that.
Islam is just another religion. It's followers are the ones that want to make ot special.
March 16, 2025 at 12:08 AM
Islam is just another religion. It's followers are the ones that want to make ot special.
@isen76.bsky.social is a muslim that can't discuss using his own words and just posts screenshots from Wikipedia. Worse than that : use arguments taken from christian sites that have already been debunked and used to argue in favor of a different religion.
March 15, 2025 at 12:22 PM
@isen76.bsky.social is a muslim that can't discuss using his own words and just posts screenshots from Wikipedia. Worse than that : use arguments taken from christian sites that have already been debunked and used to argue in favor of a different religion.
For that, you'll need to prove first that the universe is a closed system or that the universe doesn't go into cycles of expansions and contractions 0resetting entropy in each cycle and that classical thermodynamics still apply near the singularity.
March 15, 2025 at 9:33 AM
For that, you'll need to prove first that the universe is a closed system or that the universe doesn't go into cycles of expansions and contractions 0resetting entropy in each cycle and that classical thermodynamics still apply near the singularity.
So what? There was the Big Bang and now you're going to use that to infiltrate your preconceived beliefs right?
March 15, 2025 at 9:17 AM
So what? There was the Big Bang and now you're going to use that to infiltrate your preconceived beliefs right?
Your book is not proof. Your book is the claim that needs to be proven. And so far you have proved nothing.
March 15, 2025 at 7:52 AM
Your book is not proof. Your book is the claim that needs to be proven. And so far you have proved nothing.
Yes, you make an infinite regression exception for your preconceived beliefs. If your particular god is uncreated then the same can be applied to the universe.
March 15, 2025 at 7:51 AM
Yes, you make an infinite regression exception for your preconceived beliefs. If your particular god is uncreated then the same can be applied to the universe.
To make things worst for that poor argument, who created the creator? Many natural processes don't require any intelligent designer. You're just recycling old christian arguments..
March 15, 2025 at 7:47 AM
To make things worst for that poor argument, who created the creator? Many natural processes don't require any intelligent designer. You're just recycling old christian arguments..