@quildor.bsky.social
It can't, and that's a feature (the judiciary should be independent of political whims, we need only look at the US for why).
However, *can* lobby your MP for changes to entry requirements so seditionist MAGA propagandists like Feucht are denied entry. That's a much more likely approach.
However, *can* lobby your MP for changes to entry requirements so seditionist MAGA propagandists like Feucht are denied entry. That's a much more likely approach.
August 2, 2025 at 4:26 PM
It can't, and that's a feature (the judiciary should be independent of political whims, we need only look at the US for why).
However, *can* lobby your MP for changes to entry requirements so seditionist MAGA propagandists like Feucht are denied entry. That's a much more likely approach.
However, *can* lobby your MP for changes to entry requirements so seditionist MAGA propagandists like Feucht are denied entry. That's a much more likely approach.
Terrorism has a very specific narrow definition in Canadian law. Just because it's not terrorism doesn't mean it isn't intentional murder. The Toronto van attack perpetrator wasn't charged with terrorism but still got life for first degree murder.
April 27, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Terrorism has a very specific narrow definition in Canadian law. Just because it's not terrorism doesn't mean it isn't intentional murder. The Toronto van attack perpetrator wasn't charged with terrorism but still got life for first degree murder.