@quackometer.bsky.social
Yes. I have read it. They are clear that in the Equality Act, women's rights are for actual women - not males who claim to be women.
November 18, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Yes. I have read it. They are clear that in the Equality Act, women's rights are for actual women - not males who claim to be women.
Your credibility is shot while you try to bluster your way out of this.
November 18, 2025 at 7:37 PM
Your credibility is shot while you try to bluster your way out of this.
Then you need to cite the papers you actually rely on.
But I see you are still desperately scrabbling to undo the embarrassment of not knowing the difference between bioluminescence and biofluorescence in your stupid "gotcha".
But I see you are still desperately scrabbling to undo the embarrassment of not knowing the difference between bioluminescence and biofluorescence in your stupid "gotcha".
November 18, 2025 at 7:34 PM
Then you need to cite the papers you actually rely on.
But I see you are still desperately scrabbling to undo the embarrassment of not knowing the difference between bioluminescence and biofluorescence in your stupid "gotcha".
But I see you are still desperately scrabbling to undo the embarrassment of not knowing the difference between bioluminescence and biofluorescence in your stupid "gotcha".
But out of interest, how did the BBC misrepresent the law here? Cycling UK obeyed the law by restricting the women's award to actual women. The BBC are just reporting that Cycling UK have decided to follow the law.
November 18, 2025 at 7:32 PM
But out of interest, how did the BBC misrepresent the law here? Cycling UK obeyed the law by restricting the women's award to actual women. The BBC are just reporting that Cycling UK have decided to follow the law.
What a brave women Claire Sharpe is standing up for the rights of transvestite men to show how they are better cyclists than actual women.
November 18, 2025 at 7:31 PM
What a brave women Claire Sharpe is standing up for the rights of transvestite men to show how they are better cyclists than actual women.
You have googled the difference and know you are wrong. But are too dishonest to admit it.
November 16, 2025 at 9:16 AM
You have googled the difference and know you are wrong. But are too dishonest to admit it.
You moron. You have mate a huge error in trying to be clever and so now you total intellectual dishonesty kicks in. You are so rumbled.
November 16, 2025 at 7:15 AM
You moron. You have mate a huge error in trying to be clever and so now you total intellectual dishonesty kicks in. You are so rumbled.
Give it up. You are just rolling in pig shit ignorance now.
November 16, 2025 at 7:11 AM
Give it up. You are just rolling in pig shit ignorance now.
You keep scrambling around to try to recover but allyour are doing is still demonstrating your total ignorance.
You thought you were being clever. You are just a buffoon though.
You thought you were being clever. You are just a buffoon though.
November 16, 2025 at 7:09 AM
You keep scrambling around to try to recover but allyour are doing is still demonstrating your total ignorance.
You thought you were being clever. You are just a buffoon though.
You thought you were being clever. You are just a buffoon though.
I see you are frantically googling anything to try to recover from your disastrous and credibility destroying error.
November 16, 2025 at 7:05 AM
I see you are frantically googling anything to try to recover from your disastrous and credibility destroying error.
No i am not. You mate a big mistake because you do not understand science. And now we see once again your intellectual dishonesty in being unable to admit you had no clue.
November 16, 2025 at 6:56 AM
No i am not. You mate a big mistake because you do not understand science. And now we see once again your intellectual dishonesty in being unable to admit you had no clue.
Jeez. Firstly. This is an engineered cat.
Secondly, it clearly states the light is due to fluorescence. It’s in the subtitle even. This is most definitely not bioluminescence.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Secondly, it clearly states the light is due to fluorescence. It’s in the subtitle even. This is most definitely not bioluminescence.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
November 16, 2025 at 6:49 AM
Jeez. Firstly. This is an engineered cat.
Secondly, it clearly states the light is due to fluorescence. It’s in the subtitle even. This is most definitely not bioluminescence.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Secondly, it clearly states the light is due to fluorescence. It’s in the subtitle even. This is most definitely not bioluminescence.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
We have empirically observed a few mammals with suspected biofluorescence ( not bioluminescence). You do not know what you talking about.
We have never observed a mammal change Sex.
We have never observed a mammal change Sex.
November 16, 2025 at 6:42 AM
We have empirically observed a few mammals with suspected biofluorescence ( not bioluminescence). You do not know what you talking about.
We have never observed a mammal change Sex.
We have never observed a mammal change Sex.
Science is empirical. It seeks to explain observed phenomenon. If sex change had not been observed in mammals then as best we know it does not happen.
You are just busking again.
You are just busking again.
November 16, 2025 at 6:34 AM
Science is empirical. It seeks to explain observed phenomenon. If sex change had not been observed in mammals then as best we know it does not happen.
You are just busking again.
You are just busking again.
My evidence is that no mammal has been observed to change sex.
November 16, 2025 at 6:03 AM
My evidence is that no mammal has been observed to change sex.
You have said nothing that I can meaningfully responds to. It’s just flapping.
November 15, 2025 at 9:33 PM
You have said nothing that I can meaningfully responds to. It’s just flapping.
You are now blustering.
November 15, 2025 at 6:55 PM
You are now blustering.
Your sex does not change as hormones fluctuate. It for any reason. You have a sex of male or female and that does not change.
November 15, 2025 at 6:53 PM
Your sex does not change as hormones fluctuate. It for any reason. You have a sex of male or female and that does not change.
The dictionary just says “not capable of or susceptible to change”.
In mammals, an animals sex is not capable of or susceptible to change.
In mammals, an animals sex is not capable of or susceptible to change.
November 15, 2025 at 6:47 PM
The dictionary just says “not capable of or susceptible to change”.
In mammals, an animals sex is not capable of or susceptible to change.
In mammals, an animals sex is not capable of or susceptible to change.
You are playing a word game. You are free to have your own definition. But I have used mine and explained exactly what I mean.
That you may wish to have your own absurd definition does not mean I am wrong. You choose word games as you have no substantial argument.
That you may wish to have your own absurd definition does not mean I am wrong. You choose word games as you have no substantial argument.
November 15, 2025 at 5:03 PM
You are playing a word game. You are free to have your own definition. But I have used mine and explained exactly what I mean.
That you may wish to have your own absurd definition does not mean I am wrong. You choose word games as you have no substantial argument.
That you may wish to have your own absurd definition does not mean I am wrong. You choose word games as you have no substantial argument.
You are just trying to deny what we mean by immutable. Development is growth along a pathway. There are two pathways: make and female. Unable here means that there is no switching between pathways, reversal or second chance. This is in contrast with sequential hermaphrodites - that do change.
November 15, 2025 at 4:38 PM
You are just trying to deny what we mean by immutable. Development is growth along a pathway. There are two pathways: make and female. Unable here means that there is no switching between pathways, reversal or second chance. This is in contrast with sequential hermaphrodites - that do change.
Still taking no positive position on anything I see.
November 15, 2025 at 1:56 PM
Still taking no positive position on anything I see.