Qerim Nuredini
@qerim.bsky.social
Supporter of Refugges and Human Rights. LGBTQ+ally
Reposted by Qerim Nuredini
No.
The Refugee Convention explicitly states that recipient states must facilitate the naturalisation of refugees and bans penalising refugees for their method of flight.
But there's no court that enforces the Refugee Convention.
"Never Again" was supposed to do that.
The Refugee Convention explicitly states that recipient states must facilitate the naturalisation of refugees and bans penalising refugees for their method of flight.
But there's no court that enforces the Refugee Convention.
"Never Again" was supposed to do that.
Is it even in line with treaty obligations on asylum? I keep meaning to ask.
February 12, 2025 at 9:24 AM
No.
The Refugee Convention explicitly states that recipient states must facilitate the naturalisation of refugees and bans penalising refugees for their method of flight.
But there's no court that enforces the Refugee Convention.
"Never Again" was supposed to do that.
The Refugee Convention explicitly states that recipient states must facilitate the naturalisation of refugees and bans penalising refugees for their method of flight.
But there's no court that enforces the Refugee Convention.
"Never Again" was supposed to do that.