Needs more explanation

Also, I'm well aware this sort of thing is various levels of academic papers. But we can't wait for some post-doc to spend four to six years on that before releasing something. By that time LLM's will be sentient and we can just ask them. Well, or society already collapsed. Too late either way.

:homer-disappear:

Probably the fastest border check ive ever had here. Impressive.
Now ready for takeoff to Baltimore. Then 3 (?) more hours of bus.
My neighbor just took a hamburger on the plane and is happily rating that. Like, what makes you think thats ever ok. Oh well.

Well, what are you waiting for?

Excited to see you there :) dont think we've actually met before, in person

And preferably one way of doing things. No "classes vs declarative", require vs import, or even tabs vs spaces.

No underwater semantics (getters setters, proxies, proto mutations, etc). Wysiwyg is important!

It's almost as if I'm describing Forth here. But sadly I don't think Forth fits the bill.

It would need to be both friendly to humans and AI. Low barrier of entry (like JS used to be).

The challenge is probably that existing languages have a lot of prior art to teach LLMs. A new lang would need to compete against that.

So a unique name and very simple verbose primitives and semantics.