Protect Lincoln Crescent
@protectlcen1.bsky.social
184 residents say no Lincoln Crescent deserves protection, not misrepresentation and unchecked development.
This will tighten the noose around the. Areas and the viable action is needed . Unfortunately ai many are looking at leaving the area due to this development. It's not safe !
January 3, 2026 at 9:16 AM
This will tighten the noose around the. Areas and the viable action is needed . Unfortunately ai many are looking at leaving the area due to this development. It's not safe !
After writing to the council the stated that it does not qualify for affordable housing. Theses 9 houses will be overpriced, cause logistics issues for medical vehicles and waste disposal, drainage system will have to be redone as 100 yrs old .action is needed now!
January 3, 2026 at 8:51 AM
After writing to the council the stated that it does not qualify for affordable housing. Theses 9 houses will be overpriced, cause logistics issues for medical vehicles and waste disposal, drainage system will have to be redone as 100 yrs old .action is needed now!
We did the same but the council refused for us as a community to be heard even with foi request which actually states prejudice in the request to build
January 2, 2026 at 6:30 PM
We did the same but the council refused for us as a community to be heard even with foi request which actually states prejudice in the request to build
Council admits consultation errors at 69–71 Lincoln Crescent but claims “no prejudice”. 25 objections, 125 signatures, and mislabelled “affordable housing”. Not acceptable.
So why building unaffordable housing to tighten the debt noise around residents looking for homes in the bourgh
So why building unaffordable housing to tighten the debt noise around residents looking for homes in the bourgh
January 2, 2026 at 5:37 PM
Council admits consultation errors at 69–71 Lincoln Crescent but claims “no prejudice”. 25 objections, 125 signatures, and mislabelled “affordable housing”. Not acceptable.
So why building unaffordable housing to tighten the debt noise around residents looking for homes in the bourgh
So why building unaffordable housing to tighten the debt noise around residents looking for homes in the bourgh
Council admits consultation errors at 69–71 Lincoln Crescent but claims “no prejudice”. 25 objections, 125 signatures, and mislabelled “affordable housing”. Not acceptable.
This is not how the council should be listening to those in their area
This is not how the council should be listening to those in their area
January 2, 2026 at 5:34 PM
Council admits consultation errors at 69–71 Lincoln Crescent but claims “no prejudice”. 25 objections, 125 signatures, and mislabelled “affordable housing”. Not acceptable.
This is not how the council should be listening to those in their area
This is not how the council should be listening to those in their area
Council admits consultation errors at 69–71 Lincoln Crescent but claims “no prejudice”. 25 objections, 125 signatures, and mislabelled “affordable housing”. Not acceptable.
January 2, 2026 at 5:33 PM
Council admits consultation errors at 69–71 Lincoln Crescent but claims “no prejudice”. 25 objections, 125 signatures, and mislabelled “affordable housing”. Not acceptable.
Council admits consultation errors at 69–71 Lincoln Crescent but claims “no prejudice”. 25 objections, 125 signatures, and mislabelled “affordable housing”. Not acceptable.
The current post on the redevelopment is classes as the housing goals but it should not
The current post on the redevelopment is classes as the housing goals but it should not
January 2, 2026 at 5:32 PM
Council admits consultation errors at 69–71 Lincoln Crescent but claims “no prejudice”. 25 objections, 125 signatures, and mislabelled “affordable housing”. Not acceptable.
The current post on the redevelopment is classes as the housing goals but it should not
The current post on the redevelopment is classes as the housing goals but it should not
Reposted by Protect Lincoln Crescent
Amazing to think that the outline application for this was approved by the planning committee over 5 years ago - 5 years to get from outline approval to the details stage
betterhomes-enfield.org/2020/11/18/a...
betterhomes-enfield.org/2020/11/18/a...
A new “urban character” approved for Chase Farm
On Tuesday evening, Enfield Council’s Planning Committee approved new plans for the Chase Farm hospital site, which will set “a new urban character” for this area of Enfield. The plans fail to del…
betterhomes-enfield.org
November 21, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Amazing to think that the outline application for this was approved by the planning committee over 5 years ago - 5 years to get from outline approval to the details stage
betterhomes-enfield.org/2020/11/18/a...
betterhomes-enfield.org/2020/11/18/a...