Producing useless bullshit more quickly is not an improvement in educational outcomes. Why would doing things in "a fraction of the time" is usually takes be a good thing? Why do we so disrespect the labor of teaching and learning as to wish it away by outsourcing it to something that cannot think?

Delightful! I am with you. 💤

I just started cher tan's peripathetic and really liking it. could be good re: this thread from ages ago

welcome! are you still a zotero guy now?

I would really like this too, it feels like reading memoir at the moment is on a loop

its a great read (especially as a wikipedia fan!). also interesting seeing how people haven't liked the book. i asked my IG stories but no one had read it, and one just mentioned her low ratings on goodreads just as I was reading that chapter. so the search for good writing on critique continues...

I just started reading Oyler's No Judgement last week, hadn't read her work before but love reading about critique and its toughhhh going. I feel like skipping through bits all the time, maybe this continues to be an editing issue. Thanks for resharing this post, keen to read it.

plus these hexagons look fun to move around and play with while they're thinking and writing

thanks Kelli! it is interesting how these things at Masters level are so tough but then I also teach students from different specialisations/disciplines so it makes sense

Is this just for folks working at the partner unis?

Gah! sounds like me and colleagues that started last year at unimelb. 2 coffees with one, and maybe 2 zooms with another. 🤦‍♀️