I read Stout’s anti-Dodge article so I don’t find these citation findings surprising. But I also teach in B-school and study econ. I’m totally convinced that Dodge v. Ford reflects a lot (even if might not explain it). Even if we stop teaching it, they won’t stop believing and teaching it’s ethos.

Ugh. Hope they fix it soon.

For the record, this is just proof of property’s power. The contract exists to serve and protect property… as does most of criminal law. 😉

That’s devastating. These days we actually get trick-or-treaters 🙌🏾 but many still pass us up because our house is too scary.

There are a LOT of undefined terms here, so I’m going to go on a limb with *they* don’t. What even is the LPE movement? (Not agreed) Who exactly are its leaders? (Not agreed) And what are they doing (or not) that harms credibility or good will. Genuinely wondering.

I love that you responded because I was subtweeting (?) you.

Not sure I think a syllabus for a class like property is likely to tell you anything. Happy to discuss my own approach, but a review of popular casebooks is probably instructive as to the dominant approaches.

Have you, by chance, visited NYU’s faculty lounge. It’s life altering. LIFE ALTERING.

How dare they steal students’ excuse for eating like crap during law school.

I read this as James Corden and I was like, “this doesn’t feel like news.”

Waaaaay more than half: All the children, plus all the adults who were children at the time of the election, plus all the people otherwise disenfranchised in 2006. Not to mention it was a plurality win, right?

Also… what calorie count… or hippo info were you seeking?

Is this even debatable?

YES!!! How!?!?!

I would say the criminal ideation is unbecoming a crim professor, but I (accidentally) got 70 1Ls to commit petit larceny on their first day of law school.

I’ll be there next week 🤷🏾‍♀️

Imma let the edges go… but like what’s with the shaping… or lack thereof. I feel aggressed.