Kenneth Armstrong
@profkaarmstrong.bsky.social
Emeritus Professorial Fellow in Law at Sidney Sussex College, University of Cambridge. Co-editor of the Law in Context series published by Cambridge University Press. Academic Asspciate at 39 Essex Chambers.
Can be found on Substack.
Can be found on Substack.
In the end I wonder if cases will focus instead on gender reassignment as a protected characteristic? When and why cases take one form or another will be interesting to see. END
April 16, 2025 at 5:54 PM
In the end I wonder if cases will focus instead on gender reassignment as a protected characteristic? When and why cases take one form or another will be interesting to see. END
Interesting to consider how significant this perception trigger will be and whether there will be any practical difference in how cases are brought by trans women and biological females. 3/
April 16, 2025 at 5:52 PM
Interesting to consider how significant this perception trigger will be and whether there will be any practical difference in how cases are brought by trans women and biological females. 3/
Its answer is that the perception that a person is male or female is the trigger allowing legal protection of that characteristic. So treating a trans woman less favourably because of perception she is a woman’s give EA protection. 2/
April 16, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Its answer is that the perception that a person is male or female is the trigger allowing legal protection of that characteristic. So treating a trans woman less favourably because of perception she is a woman’s give EA protection. 2/