banner
probillofrights.bsky.social
@probillofrights.bsky.social
People with bad ideas have to resort to violence quickly because their ideas are not strong enough to survive without violence.
The regime shot Renee Nicole Good and then labeled her a domestic terrorist.

But they didn’t do it because they’re strong — they did it because they’re weak and scared.

Congress must answer the people’s call to get ICE Out For Good: indivisible.org/ice-out-sena... #ICEOutForGood
January 15, 2026 at 1:40 AM
Reposted
Just guessing here, but I suspect the White House is pushing so hard for wars of conquest on multiple fronts because they see their support collapsing ahead of the midterms and worry they won't get another shot. An example of how tyrants become more dangerous as they get weaker, not less.
January 14, 2026 at 7:51 PM
The Bill of Rights applies to every American, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion or gender!
January 15, 2026 at 12:19 AM
Reminder: due process is important!
January 15, 2026 at 12:00 AM
I don't know who needs to hear this.

Vengeance is mine saith the Lord.

In other words, not Trump's, not MAGA's. To be clear, MAGA is NOT on the Lord's side and is NOT doing the Lord's will. In fact, their cruelty and hypocrisy are exactly what Christ frequently condemned.
January 12, 2026 at 10:17 PM
The officer in Minneapolis may have been mad but he wasn't following any safety protocols by having a cell phone in one hand and a gun in the other. And he shot AFTER he was out of the way, so it amounts to a retaliatory killing. Should ICE be allowed to do that? If so,when exactly is it okay?
January 10, 2026 at 4:42 PM
The question is not whether Renee Good was innocent or guilty, it's whether you believe she committed a capital offense by "obstructing" ICE? If so, what other actions ought to result in immediate execution?
January 10, 2026 at 4:39 PM
After the shooting in Minneapolis this week, the question is whether we want to live in a country where law enforcement is given cart blanche to kill anyone, who may possibly obstruct them? And if so what do you do when they start doing things that you don't like? You have given them the power.
January 10, 2026 at 4:35 PM
Absolutely not! "Self-defense" does NOT include firing on survivors clinging to a boat! If the tables were turned and someone fired on US soldiers outside of a boat, they would completely correctly be accused of and indeed guilty of committing a war crime.
Reporter: “You said that the follow-up strike was lawful. What law is it that allows no survivors?”

Leavitt: “The strike conducted on September 2 was conducted in self-defense to protect Americans and vital United States interests…And in accordance with the law of armed conflict.”
December 2, 2025 at 3:41 AM
Where are the leaders in Congress who will stand up to this administration regardless of the cost? Show some freaking spine!
December 2, 2025 at 3:36 AM
An administration that looks up to dictators is unsurprisingly acting more and more outside of the law. They think they can do whatever they want. There needs to be some serious accountability! And sooner rather than later.
@markhertling.bsky.social: “When you're talking about striking against someone who's wounded and clinging to debris…Deliberately targeting such a person isn't a tactical decision, it's a war crime by the Geneva Convention, the laws of land warfare, and the U.N. Charter.”
December 2, 2025 at 3:19 AM
Is this the post of a serious person? Do we want someone as SecDef who jokes about killing people? Especially after giving an order to kill the survivors of the first attack on the boat. A clear violation of the Geneva Convention regardless of whether the first strike was legal or not.
December 2, 2025 at 3:15 AM
What are the chances that the sphere around this president will financially benefit from this Ukraine surrender plan? I would say really, really high. He is clearly only concerned about himself at all times.
November 23, 2025 at 7:53 PM
Remember in the treaty signed to end World War II that France had to give Germany a bunch of land and limit the size of its army? Oh wait, those are terms for the aggressor. Why in the world should Ukraine have to be punished for Putin's aggression? The world is upside down. #putinsucks #vivaukraine
November 23, 2025 at 6:05 PM
President Trump should hereafter be called Neville Chamberlain Jr when it comes to appeasing a horrible dictator in Putin. History teaches us that this doesn't end well for the world!
November 22, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Reposted
Despite being threatened by the President of the United States, these Senators and Representatives will not be deterred. They will not be silenced. They will not be intimidated. They love this country and believe we are better than what the politics represent!
November 20, 2025 at 10:56 PM
There are no words to describe how horrible this plan is. It rewards Russia with additional territory and acts as if Ukraine were the aggressor. #horribleplan #slavaukraini #stopputin
www.axios.com/2025/11/20/t...
Trump's full 28-point Ukraine-Russia peace plan
The full plan was obtained by Axios and verified by Ukrainian and U.S. officials.
www.axios.com
November 21, 2025 at 12:31 AM
Mr. President, what exactly bothers you about people not obeying unlawful orders?
November 20, 2025 at 10:12 PM
How will the White House ballroom help everyday Americans? Can anyone give a legitimate reason why it needs to be built, beyond Trump wants it? The vanity of Trump appears to be neverending!
October 24, 2025 at 12:09 AM
People who refuse to do their jobs, negatively affecting millions and causing thousands to not get paid should be fired immediately. When will we hold Congress accountable for their incompetence and corruption? #firecongress #accountability #doyourjob #comebacktoplanetearthcongress
October 13, 2025 at 5:06 PM
I have said it before and I will say it again, Congress's pay or even their entire job should be based on their performance. And not passing a budget should be fireable offense as if in any other job if you couldn't accomplish the most basic requirement of the job, you would be fired!
October 13, 2025 at 1:08 AM
Strong positions can withstand scrutiny and are defensible. Bad ideas need for opposing views to be silenced. Intimidating the media and those with whom you disagree is a major indication that you have bad ideas!
#firstamendment #freedomofspeech #billofrights #cancelingoftheamericanmind
September 19, 2025 at 1:45 AM
We all ought to feel safe to express our views without fear of violence. One can strongly disagree with some of Charlie Kirk's views without malice towards him. He didn't deserve his fate. But I also fear the repression by the government of voices opposed to Charlie Kirk's views. #1stamendment
September 14, 2025 at 1:51 PM