8a (iii)
As per the evidence, estate attorneys are *allowed to and, therefore, willing to escalate to harmful retaliations against the decedent’s intended beneficiary in order to silence inquiries (more details later)

🧵3/3
(iv) abuse of legal authority against the public, exploit this susceptibility as the public depends on attorneys for that expertise and are limited to Florida licensed attorneys (v) there is a reluctance to capitalize on opportunities👉facilitate the advancement of laws in the public’s interest

🧵2/3
(ii) willingness to disregard laws, and surpress credible, and substantial evidence to manipulate the process and its outcome (iii) manipulate and ultimately deny the public’s essential right to due process (iv) abuse of legal knowledge and authority against the public and exploit this…🧵👇

2/2Consequently, the public is also left without any means to pursue malpractice investigations or obtain related legal support (more details/facts will follow - in process)

2/2
l believe your self-regulatory organization is performing contrary to to the public interest. The absence of oversight is especially troubling as it compromises professional standards.

🧵/3To paraphrase Ronald Dworkin…again, if the lawschools do not teach ethics seriously, then they do not take the conduct and reputation of lawyers seriously either”
@americanbar.org
@flasupremecourt.bsky.social
@stanfordlaw.bsky.social
@harvardcorpgov.bsky.social
@emorylawjournal.bsky.social