* 𝓙𝒖𝒅𝒂𝒔.
@princekamukura.bsky.social
⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐚 ⠀: ⠀moral insanity ; ⠀𝙥𝙨𝙮𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙥𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙮.
Although, an “Ultimate” like myself seems to be more related to Pokemon than any human being could. I’m not particularly sure how I should feel about that.
In conclusion, ultimately, no. Humans shouldn’t be considered. But, I am rather new to this field, so I might not be the best candidate to ask.
In conclusion, ultimately, no. Humans shouldn’t be considered. But, I am rather new to this field, so I might not be the best candidate to ask.
November 20, 2025 at 3:04 AM
Although, an “Ultimate” like myself seems to be more related to Pokemon than any human being could. I’m not particularly sure how I should feel about that.
In conclusion, ultimately, no. Humans shouldn’t be considered. But, I am rather new to this field, so I might not be the best candidate to ask.
In conclusion, ultimately, no. Humans shouldn’t be considered. But, I am rather new to this field, so I might not be the best candidate to ask.
With how we label species and ancestors, pokemon do not get this same luxury. They are simply labeled as “pokemon.” We don’t categorize them like we would for mammals, reptiles, and so on. In the case of intermingling, and transferring properties down onto another, then it gets rather convoluted.
+
+
November 20, 2025 at 3:04 AM
With how we label species and ancestors, pokemon do not get this same luxury. They are simply labeled as “pokemon.” We don’t categorize them like we would for mammals, reptiles, and so on. In the case of intermingling, and transferring properties down onto another, then it gets rather convoluted.
+
+
Well …
Appearance wise, the differences are as clear to anyone with working eyes. However, on a more scientific viewpoint, then there isn’t enough data for a meaningful answer.
From what I gathered, humans and pokemon are not biologically related in the same sense humans & wild animals are.
+
Appearance wise, the differences are as clear to anyone with working eyes. However, on a more scientific viewpoint, then there isn’t enough data for a meaningful answer.
From what I gathered, humans and pokemon are not biologically related in the same sense humans & wild animals are.
+
November 20, 2025 at 3:04 AM
Well …
Appearance wise, the differences are as clear to anyone with working eyes. However, on a more scientific viewpoint, then there isn’t enough data for a meaningful answer.
From what I gathered, humans and pokemon are not biologically related in the same sense humans & wild animals are.
+
Appearance wise, the differences are as clear to anyone with working eyes. However, on a more scientific viewpoint, then there isn’t enough data for a meaningful answer.
From what I gathered, humans and pokemon are not biologically related in the same sense humans & wild animals are.
+
November 20, 2025 at 2:47 AM
November 20, 2025 at 2:45 AM
November 20, 2025 at 2:44 AM
Reposted by * 𝓙𝒖𝒅𝒂𝒔.
[⛈️] i didn't even notice this was someone else's post at first i was just like "yeah that's the most lusamine-core image i've seen"
November 20, 2025 at 2:29 AM
[⛈️] i didn't even notice this was someone else's post at first i was just like "yeah that's the most lusamine-core image i've seen"
November 20, 2025 at 2:23 AM
November 20, 2025 at 2:20 AM
@tellmewhatiam.bsky.social
As long as we don’t start accident earthquakes, sure. Perhaps we’ll set it up under the water.
As long as we don’t start accident earthquakes, sure. Perhaps we’ll set it up under the water.
November 20, 2025 at 2:17 AM
@tellmewhatiam.bsky.social
As long as we don’t start accident earthquakes, sure. Perhaps we’ll set it up under the water.
As long as we don’t start accident earthquakes, sure. Perhaps we’ll set it up under the water.
November 20, 2025 at 2:15 AM
November 20, 2025 at 2:14 AM
… What. What is it ? You’re just standing there, doing nothing.
November 20, 2025 at 2:00 AM
… What. What is it ? You’re just standing there, doing nothing.