Yes this was the misstep. Won't happen again. Thank you for your support 🙏

Back to building the products you actually want.

We are slowing it down!

Yes there is slight element of FOMO to it, but at the same time I am not sold on the concept. Keeping using AI as on demand tool seems to be working well for us.

These are the kind of things that resonate deeply, thanks for sharing. Mine is 13 and is about to beat me at a triathlon event. Cound not be prouder. Btw please consider adding RSS feed to your site so we can add it to Kagi Small Web project.

First reaction: This is directionally correct. The above was extracted with the help of Kagi Assistant so may contain errors. A deeper reading will be necessary to get all the details.

Terms will follow "ordinary commercial practices": The court indicates that the agreements should align with standard industry practices and that it does not want to interfere with ordinary business arrangements. pg 177, 180

Pricing will not be at "marginal cost": The court explicitly rejects the plaintiffs' proposal to force Google to offer syndication at its marginal cost. It reasons that such pricing would destroy the commercial market for search syndication and harm other competitors like Microsoft and Brave. pg 175

No synthetic queries: Google will not be required to process "synthetic queries" from competitors. The court found that the plaintiffs did not provide enough proof that this was necessary for improving search quality or was a common industry practice. pg 178

Restrictions on use: Google will be allowed to place "ordinary commercial restrictions" on how competitors use the syndicated search results. This means competitors will be prohibited from activities like scraping, crawling, or indexing the results to protect Google's intellectual property. pg 177