Academic website: ppcreanza.com
1️⃣ Firm effects matter greatly in explaining inventive productivity
2️⃣ Lab firms perform better, net of sorting and size/field controls
3️⃣ Joining a lab raises within-inventor productivity
4️⃣ Opening a lab raises firm productivity
(8/13)
1️⃣ Firm effects matter greatly in explaining inventive productivity
2️⃣ Lab firms perform better, net of sorting and size/field controls
3️⃣ Joining a lab raises within-inventor productivity
4️⃣ Opening a lab raises firm productivity
(8/13)
R&D labs spread rapidly after consolidation. Lab-owning firms were substantially more innovative than others.
I use an inventor–firm panel and AKM framework to dig deeper. (7/13)
R&D labs spread rapidly after consolidation. Lab-owning firms were substantially more innovative than others.
I use an inventor–firm panel and AKM framework to dig deeper. (7/13)
Among firms that were already patenting before 1895:
🔹 + 6 patents per year (≈ 4× increase)
🔹 + 0.6 breakthroughs per year (≈ 6× increase)
Firms that had never patented became 23 pp more likely to start. (6/13)
Among firms that were already patenting before 1895:
🔹 + 6 patents per year (≈ 4× increase)
🔹 + 0.6 breakthroughs per year (≈ 6× increase)
Firms that had never patented became 23 pp more likely to start. (6/13)
This new dataset links 137,000 firm patent assignees, and 1 million inventors—the first inventor–firm panel before 1940. (4/13)
This new dataset links 137,000 firm patent assignees, and 1 million inventors—the first inventor–firm panel before 1940. (4/13)
At the same time, the US entered a golden age of technological innovation 💡
Were these two developments connected? Many influential narratives argue they were, from Chandler to DeLong. (2/13)
At the same time, the US entered a golden age of technological innovation 💡
Were these two developments connected? Many influential narratives argue they were, from Chandler to DeLong. (2/13)
My JMP asks a classic question:
Do large, dominant firms foster or hinder innovation?
To study this, I turn to the Great Merger Wave (1895–1904), when >2,600 U.S. firms combined into corporate giants like U.S. Steel and DuPont.
A JMP 🧵👇 (1/13)
My JMP asks a classic question:
Do large, dominant firms foster or hinder innovation?
To study this, I turn to the Great Merger Wave (1895–1904), when >2,600 U.S. firms combined into corporate giants like U.S. Steel and DuPont.
A JMP 🧵👇 (1/13)