It’s close to identical to EN21. Main difference would be a new AI pdf summarizer (which I’m conflicted about), links to citation data in web of science, and quoting pdf option

Most of the differences are in the first few paragraphs of their selection criteria page. Getting rid of LSTRC is the biggie, but there are some interesting language changes when comparing the new page with an older version using Wayback Machine

I made some checklists based on published criteria. 😊 researchguides.library.wisc.edu/c.php?g=1154...

You have to click “track status” and then, if prompted, sign in a second time. It should then appear in the queue where you can download it. Super annoying.

It seemed to be working in Chrome better today (I usually use Firefox). Glad it wasnt just my computer malfunctioning 😅

Also its, not it’s. Dang autocorrect 😆

As a note Scopus seems to be working better in Chrome for whatever reason

It just started working again for me too! I noticed PubMed didnt seem to go down this weekend, bur the MeSH database went down completely, then it was just the individual pages yesterday and this morning. Hopefully shenanigans are over…..

I laughed quite a few times reading the clown article sections Copilot made for me 😆

For those doing line by lines, make sure scopus is interpreting the search reference number, and not just searching for the number. Caused me a massive headache figuring out that new glitch existed when doing a systematic review search 😅 hopefully that’s fixed by now

I’ve been noticing this a lot recently too, especially with inconsistency on AND NOTs and it refusing to acknowledge search numbers. I’ve also noticed the results numbers don’t always show up on the results page

Oh no!!! Maybe widespread glitches, then. At least Scopus isn’t bullying me, specifically, then 😅

Took way too long of banging my head against the wall to figure this out when doing a line-by-line if one of my reviews 😅