My commercial account was also banned a few days ago.
I escaped X and built a house in Bluesky, but it was burned down just like X.

I just wanted Bluesky to be peaceful. So why? Why would the CEO of all people destroy it? It doesn't make sense.

Bluesky is a growing service, and many of the features it needs to implement haven't been implemented yet. It's just making promises for the future.
Many users came to Bluesky trusting those promises. And now, Bluesky's CEO has broken that implicit promise.
It's a fatal mistake.

I think the conditions for continued investment in Bluesky are:
- The CEO must be fired or forced to apologize
- A fundamental review of moderation
I think it's impossible for Bluesky to continue with the current situation unresolved.

Like you, I will send an email to the investors of Bluesky. I don't want to see the Bluesky manager destroy the peace of Bluesky with his own hands.

It's becoming increasingly clear over the past few days that the future of AT Protocol is very bleak.
Who on earth would want to invest in this situation?

I think they should at least survey users about the implementation of "Suggested for you". At least, this is a big complaint for me.

It's a difficult problem.

I want all the immigrants to Bluesky to be happy. I know this is an inconvenient place, but I want them to learn how to use new SNS. Of course, fighting is one of the joys of life, but we must be careful not to spread it carelessly.

It is unhappy to meet someone by the agenda of conflict as in X. It is happier to meet someone in the process of searching for something you love, and I feel that many people who have become accustomed to conflict in X have forgotten that happiness.