(5/5) If you want to see more advice, you can read the full article by Sundström here:
doi.org/10.1017/S174...

(4/5) Additionally, Sundström’s personal suggestion is to think of the response memo as a “to-do-list” for revising the manuscript based on the decision letter.

(3/5) Sundström also recommends being open and constructive in responding to reviewers’ comments, considering writing a response memo as part of a process of academic exchange.

(2/5) The author stresses the importance of paying careful attention to how the editor phrases what you are asked to do, even if it’s very short.

(5/5) Read more about Suárez-Cao’s article here: doi.org/10.1017/S174...

(4/5) Suárez-Cao’s article shows that the gendered division of labor can be a strategic advantage when gender parity becomes a priority in public policy during a crisis.

(3/5) In Chile, however, women political scientists influenced the design of the electoral mechanism for the 2021-22 constitutional assembly, leveraging their expertise and contributing to greater women’s representation in the assembly.

(2/5) Women doing “gender” work and men focusing on “other” areas of work, a gendered division of labor, is often believed to have only negative impacts on the status of women.