Is that really the act of an innocent man

Coming here does make me realize just how putrid Twitter has gotten. I feel like I drink clean water here and sewage there.

He was more qualified than literally anyone else in the world to know why Hillary was a bad candidate

But whatever this means, it isn’t the obvious prohibition that Alito and the article he cited seem to characterize it as

Rule 81(4)(b) is actually one of the most inscrutable texts I can recall seeing. The civil rules apply in habeas cases to the extent that the practices are similar? Not much help when the whole question is whether the practices are similar.

Also, I’m not sure what Rule 81 looked like in 1970, when the article Alito is citing was published, but the modern version of Rule 81 does not, to put it mildly, seem to obviously bar Rule 23’s application in habeas cases.

I used to subscribe to a prominent left-wing legal podcast but it was unlistenable for this reason

Let’s just say, purely for argument’s sake, that you said what he says you said. I’m not saying you said it! But let’s just say, for a moment, that you said it. What would your reaction be?

He has many times on the other site. It was a DM IIRC.

What if you don’t think they’ve been functioning well, but think that it’s important that they function well because institutions are good, and think that other institutions have been functioning well (e.g., much of the executive branch, NATO)?

What are you supposed to do if you genuinely think institutions are good, then?

Nuclear take is that they are sort of the working class, which is why absolute and uncritical valorization of the working class is misguided and any vaporization must be qualified

That’s right.

Comacho had sincere commitment to civic virtue and tried his best to do right by his people. I would happily trade Trump for Comacho.

Nice

Is there a mechanism that prevents Elon Musk from buying it?