@polypsyches.bsky.social
Navel-gazers only, please
February 12, 2025 at 4:57 AM
Navel-gazers only, please
If we imagine “something” as being “a quantity of thingness” then “nothing” should qualify as something because “none” does specify an amount.
The utter absence of thingness creates a vacuum which can be observed and interpreted to “behave” as though it were thing-ey
The utter absence of thingness creates a vacuum which can be observed and interpreted to “behave” as though it were thing-ey
November 28, 2024 at 5:12 AM
If we imagine “something” as being “a quantity of thingness” then “nothing” should qualify as something because “none” does specify an amount.
The utter absence of thingness creates a vacuum which can be observed and interpreted to “behave” as though it were thing-ey
The utter absence of thingness creates a vacuum which can be observed and interpreted to “behave” as though it were thing-ey