*música de tensión

were you the mistaken one?

I do wonder about the advantages of crystallising a complex system into a hyper simplistic concept. That just erases nuance and obviously sets up a very bad precedent.

Or primary producers the powerhouse of ecosystems? XD

The phrase wasn't ubiquitous here, to be fair.

It was obviously teached broadly what the mitochondria *do*, not quite what they *are*.

A tiny victory over essentialism, if you ask me.

I think that if you want to express what they are, you have to account for structure, function and history.

It's more common in disciplines that have retained the naturalist (not the philosophical one) mindset: "I see, I describe".
Still, I think we might be a little biased towards non-mammal organisms.

I can't say in don't recommend it.

You know what's the combination I like the least? Being able to push the team but at the same time having to acknowledge my own mediocrity.

Wish you the best.

I think you should prioritise a good mentor. Good in mentoring, I mean.

I get the point, and I agree, partially. Going PhD time doesn't mean a lifetime commitment to that research line.

The prospects are grim, I agree. We've got a lot in our hands.

Let's yap in unison.

I don't even think it's a recent thing.