@polarsuns.bsky.social
Photographer focusing on the natural form, whether it be a woman or a mountain or a tree.
I am always looking to collaborate with other follow artists on either side of the lens.
Thank you for visiting my page.
I am always looking to collaborate with other follow artists on either side of the lens.
Thank you for visiting my page.
love the composition. hate the blur. but well framed!
October 24, 2025 at 6:43 PM
love the composition. hate the blur. but well framed!
These candid shots are my favorites. Beauty in the mundane.
October 9, 2025 at 11:10 AM
These candid shots are my favorites. Beauty in the mundane.
that's some reading rainbow...
October 3, 2025 at 7:13 PM
that's some reading rainbow...
you do seem to have a thing for libraries.
October 3, 2025 at 6:49 PM
you do seem to have a thing for libraries.
Look up LBJ's Bay of Tonkin hoax and how we got lied into the Viet Nam war. Look up the WSJ article "Three Friends Chatting: How the Steele Dossier Was Created" detailing the Obama manufacture of the "evidence" used to discredit the Trump.
The media/government lies all the time.
The media/government lies all the time.
September 26, 2025 at 3:40 PM
Look up LBJ's Bay of Tonkin hoax and how we got lied into the Viet Nam war. Look up the WSJ article "Three Friends Chatting: How the Steele Dossier Was Created" detailing the Obama manufacture of the "evidence" used to discredit the Trump.
The media/government lies all the time.
The media/government lies all the time.
Look up project mockingbird (JFK) & Operation Mockingbird (different): Project Mockingbird was the CIA operation, begun in the early years of the Cold War, and manipulated domestic American news media organizations for propaganda purposes.
September 26, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Look up project mockingbird (JFK) & Operation Mockingbird (different): Project Mockingbird was the CIA operation, begun in the early years of the Cold War, and manipulated domestic American news media organizations for propaganda purposes.
“Senior Biden Administration officials, including White House officials, conducted repeated and sustained outreach to [YouTube] and pressed the Company regarding certain user-generated content... Biden Administration officials continued to press to remove non-violative user-generated content."
September 26, 2025 at 3:30 PM
“Senior Biden Administration officials, including White House officials, conducted repeated and sustained outreach to [YouTube] and pressed the Company regarding certain user-generated content... Biden Administration officials continued to press to remove non-violative user-generated content."
Also, people like Stephen king have made wild accusations only to walk it back and apologize. There is not an overwhelming body of evidence to back these wild claims.
Nothing wrong with my thumbs, I just went to ChatGPT.
There are plenty of quotes on racial crime stats, but they are factual.
Nothing wrong with my thumbs, I just went to ChatGPT.
There are plenty of quotes on racial crime stats, but they are factual.
September 13, 2025 at 7:04 PM
Also, people like Stephen king have made wild accusations only to walk it back and apologize. There is not an overwhelming body of evidence to back these wild claims.
Nothing wrong with my thumbs, I just went to ChatGPT.
There are plenty of quotes on racial crime stats, but they are factual.
Nothing wrong with my thumbs, I just went to ChatGPT.
There are plenty of quotes on racial crime stats, but they are factual.
Interesting. When I run it through chatGPT there is no reference. Sadly, I have to ask, AI? Where does this come from exactly? I’d like to see the whole clip. That said, it’s inflammatory - but isolated. The charge here (was it you?) is that kirk commands thugs & keeps a list of POC to target.
September 13, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Interesting. When I run it through chatGPT there is no reference. Sadly, I have to ask, AI? Where does this come from exactly? I’d like to see the whole clip. That said, it’s inflammatory - but isolated. The charge here (was it you?) is that kirk commands thugs & keeps a list of POC to target.
Yes. I would be wrong. Simple, no?
September 13, 2025 at 11:43 AM
Yes. I would be wrong. Simple, no?
You have convinced me. Through your non-argument and complete lack of evidence and repeated “nu-uh. He did too”, I now believe you 100%.
By the way, his IG account now has 10M followers. If only they could see the zero evidence you presented then they too will know your special truth as I do.
By the way, his IG account now has 10M followers. If only they could see the zero evidence you presented then they too will know your special truth as I do.
Nada.you
September 13, 2025 at 1:17 AM
You have convinced me. Through your non-argument and complete lack of evidence and repeated “nu-uh. He did too”, I now believe you 100%.
By the way, his IG account now has 10M followers. If only they could see the zero evidence you presented then they too will know your special truth as I do.
By the way, his IG account now has 10M followers. If only they could see the zero evidence you presented then they too will know your special truth as I do.
Sigh. Philosophically you cannot prove a negative. The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim.
If you say UFOs and aliens exist, you have to show your proof. I don’t have to show you that they don’t exist - can’t prove a negative.
If you say UFOs and aliens exist, you have to show your proof. I don’t have to show you that they don’t exist - can’t prove a negative.
September 12, 2025 at 11:34 PM
Sigh. Philosophically you cannot prove a negative. The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim.
If you say UFOs and aliens exist, you have to show your proof. I don’t have to show you that they don’t exist - can’t prove a negative.
If you say UFOs and aliens exist, you have to show your proof. I don’t have to show you that they don’t exist - can’t prove a negative.
I did look for them. Zero primary source for Charlie Kirk targeting people of color or henchmen at his command. Plenty of references of him promoting Christian thought (I’m an atheist), which many find inherently offensive. But these other claims? Zero.
September 12, 2025 at 11:32 PM
I did look for them. Zero primary source for Charlie Kirk targeting people of color or henchmen at his command. Plenty of references of him promoting Christian thought (I’m an atheist), which many find inherently offensive. But these other claims? Zero.
Digital hit lists? Thugs at his command dispensing threats at his behest? Where do you hear these things and why do you believe it? A single credible primary source please. Just one. Pretty please.
September 12, 2025 at 11:28 PM
Digital hit lists? Thugs at his command dispensing threats at his behest? Where do you hear these things and why do you believe it? A single credible primary source please. Just one. Pretty please.
Which quote endorsed all of what things?
September 12, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Which quote endorsed all of what things?
Thank you. It is the complete absence of your claim that just proved my point.
See? Now we can talk.
You agree that there is no evidence for your claim.
You want to split hairs over “eulogize”.
Now that you have conceded your point, I’ll grant you that eulogize may be overstating it.
See? Now we can talk.
You agree that there is no evidence for your claim.
You want to split hairs over “eulogize”.
Now that you have conceded your point, I’ll grant you that eulogize may be overstating it.
September 12, 2025 at 11:18 PM
Thank you. It is the complete absence of your claim that just proved my point.
See? Now we can talk.
You agree that there is no evidence for your claim.
You want to split hairs over “eulogize”.
Now that you have conceded your point, I’ll grant you that eulogize may be overstating it.
See? Now we can talk.
You agree that there is no evidence for your claim.
You want to split hairs over “eulogize”.
Now that you have conceded your point, I’ll grant you that eulogize may be overstating it.
So you are asking me to prove your lie? Put differently, he is being eulogized all over the internet and television, including MSNBC, Colbert, the view, New York Times, etc. and there is nothing supporting your lie.
And you mean inductive not deductive reasoning.
Always happy to guide you.
And you mean inductive not deductive reasoning.
Always happy to guide you.
September 12, 2025 at 10:50 PM
So you are asking me to prove your lie? Put differently, he is being eulogized all over the internet and television, including MSNBC, Colbert, the view, New York Times, etc. and there is nothing supporting your lie.
And you mean inductive not deductive reasoning.
Always happy to guide you.
And you mean inductive not deductive reasoning.
Always happy to guide you.
I am not calling you a liar.
I proved that you are a liar.
Thank you for the “artiste” compliment, I try.
I proved that you are a liar.
Thank you for the “artiste” compliment, I try.
September 12, 2025 at 10:36 PM
I am not calling you a liar.
I proved that you are a liar.
Thank you for the “artiste” compliment, I try.
I proved that you are a liar.
Thank you for the “artiste” compliment, I try.
I shoot boudoir photography. Thank you. And you lack critical thought and primary sources but have the wherewithal for ad hominem attacks. According to internet rules, I won.
September 12, 2025 at 10:27 PM
I shoot boudoir photography. Thank you. And you lack critical thought and primary sources but have the wherewithal for ad hominem attacks. According to internet rules, I won.