Pocket the Fool
@pocketthefool.bsky.social
18 months ago:
GOVERN ME HARDER DADDY
Today:
NO NOT LIKE THAT
GOVERN ME HARDER DADDY
Today:
NO NOT LIKE THAT
January 11, 2026 at 6:36 PM
18 months ago:
GOVERN ME HARDER DADDY
Today:
NO NOT LIKE THAT
GOVERN ME HARDER DADDY
Today:
NO NOT LIKE THAT
I’m sure Willie Brown thought the same about Kamala Harris
November 19, 2025 at 8:15 PM
I’m sure Willie Brown thought the same about Kamala Harris
Just remember, you little twink - when you piss and moan about Trump’s name not appearing in the client list because OBVIOUSLY THEY TOOK IT OUT, you’re telling on yourself…by the same argument, THEY TOOK YOUR NAME OUT TOO.
November 19, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Just remember, you little twink - when you piss and moan about Trump’s name not appearing in the client list because OBVIOUSLY THEY TOOK IT OUT, you’re telling on yourself…by the same argument, THEY TOOK YOUR NAME OUT TOO.
It’s not for nothing that they call him Slick Willie ya know
November 14, 2025 at 3:35 AM
It’s not for nothing that they call him Slick Willie ya know
Sure thing, dude.
Tell my brother we met
Tell my brother we met
November 14, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Sure thing, dude.
Tell my brother we met
Tell my brother we met
I don’t post for follows, I post for fun.
Aren’t you having fun?
You can’t be thinking too hard with your one note argument that’s falling flatter than a pancake under a steamroller, so you must be in it for something else.
If you don’t want people to respond to your idiocy - stop posting it.
Aren’t you having fun?
You can’t be thinking too hard with your one note argument that’s falling flatter than a pancake under a steamroller, so you must be in it for something else.
If you don’t want people to respond to your idiocy - stop posting it.
November 14, 2025 at 1:23 AM
I don’t post for follows, I post for fun.
Aren’t you having fun?
You can’t be thinking too hard with your one note argument that’s falling flatter than a pancake under a steamroller, so you must be in it for something else.
If you don’t want people to respond to your idiocy - stop posting it.
Aren’t you having fun?
You can’t be thinking too hard with your one note argument that’s falling flatter than a pancake under a steamroller, so you must be in it for something else.
If you don’t want people to respond to your idiocy - stop posting it.
The sword cuts both ways, willywagger.
November 14, 2025 at 12:50 AM
The sword cuts both ways, willywagger.
The answer seems clear if you examine “the dog that didn’t bark” during the four years of President Otto Penn.
November 13, 2025 at 9:13 PM
The answer seems clear if you examine “the dog that didn’t bark” during the four years of President Otto Penn.
Oh I see!!
It’s a priorities thing!
They will protect pedophiles as long as doing so brings them political advantage…WHILE THEY ARE IN THE MINORITY.
Can you explain why they sat on the Epstein files before Trump was re-elected, too?
Or are you another creep like Oswego Willy?
It’s a priorities thing!
They will protect pedophiles as long as doing so brings them political advantage…WHILE THEY ARE IN THE MINORITY.
Can you explain why they sat on the Epstein files before Trump was re-elected, too?
Or are you another creep like Oswego Willy?
November 13, 2025 at 9:11 PM
Oh I see!!
It’s a priorities thing!
They will protect pedophiles as long as doing so brings them political advantage…WHILE THEY ARE IN THE MINORITY.
Can you explain why they sat on the Epstein files before Trump was re-elected, too?
Or are you another creep like Oswego Willy?
It’s a priorities thing!
They will protect pedophiles as long as doing so brings them political advantage…WHILE THEY ARE IN THE MINORITY.
Can you explain why they sat on the Epstein files before Trump was re-elected, too?
Or are you another creep like Oswego Willy?
And let me go even further! Yesterday, Tim Burchett asked for unanimous consent to drop the whole package. Speaker Johnson agreed.
Hakeem Jeffries objected. No UC, no release.
WHY? Who is the pedophile that you and your party are protecting?
Your rules - how am I doing, you creep?
Hakeem Jeffries objected. No UC, no release.
WHY? Who is the pedophile that you and your party are protecting?
Your rules - how am I doing, you creep?
November 13, 2025 at 8:47 PM
And let me go even further! Yesterday, Tim Burchett asked for unanimous consent to drop the whole package. Speaker Johnson agreed.
Hakeem Jeffries objected. No UC, no release.
WHY? Who is the pedophile that you and your party are protecting?
Your rules - how am I doing, you creep?
Hakeem Jeffries objected. No UC, no release.
WHY? Who is the pedophile that you and your party are protecting?
Your rules - how am I doing, you creep?
I’m curious about why you’re so all fired up about this issue when you and your party had the power to release the Epstein files and, if they really say what you’re wishcasting, prevent 45 from becoming 47?
Coulda done it…with GREAT EFFECT…didn’t when you had the chance.
But I’m the creepy one?
Coulda done it…with GREAT EFFECT…didn’t when you had the chance.
But I’m the creepy one?
a fat man with a mustache is sitting on an airplane .
ALT: a fat man with a mustache is sitting on an airplane .
media.tenor.com
November 13, 2025 at 8:47 PM
I’m curious about why you’re so all fired up about this issue when you and your party had the power to release the Epstein files and, if they really say what you’re wishcasting, prevent 45 from becoming 47?
Coulda done it…with GREAT EFFECT…didn’t when you had the chance.
But I’m the creepy one?
Coulda done it…with GREAT EFFECT…didn’t when you had the chance.
But I’m the creepy one?
Yeah, EXACTLY 42 days…I don’t know why that number stuck in my head, or why I associated it so strongly with something -I forget what- that was a HUGE L on the board even six months before it began.
Maybe you can help me?
Maybe you can help me?
November 13, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Yeah, EXACTLY 42 days…I don’t know why that number stuck in my head, or why I associated it so strongly with something -I forget what- that was a HUGE L on the board even six months before it began.
Maybe you can help me?
Maybe you can help me?
No, I like the idea of playing by your rules
November 13, 2025 at 7:07 PM
No, I like the idea of playing by your rules
I dunno man…
If the L was already on the board before we got started, why not wait, oh let’s just pick a random number and say…
42 days?
Not like there is precedent now, right?
If the L was already on the board before we got started, why not wait, oh let’s just pick a random number and say…
42 days?
Not like there is precedent now, right?
November 13, 2025 at 5:19 PM
I dunno man…
If the L was already on the board before we got started, why not wait, oh let’s just pick a random number and say…
42 days?
Not like there is precedent now, right?
If the L was already on the board before we got started, why not wait, oh let’s just pick a random number and say…
42 days?
Not like there is precedent now, right?
