𝜋🐀
@pirat.bsky.social
Zumindest war es nicht Sixpack Alpha Jesus, sondern sein adipöser Lebensgefährte.
Soviel erinnere ich.
Soviel erinnere ich.
August 28, 2025 at 9:17 AM
Zumindest war es nicht Sixpack Alpha Jesus, sondern sein adipöser Lebensgefährte.
Soviel erinnere ich.
Soviel erinnere ich.
Hätte auf Kohl getippt, den alten kommunisten mit seiner Vermögenssteuer Verdoppelung.
August 27, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Hätte auf Kohl getippt, den alten kommunisten mit seiner Vermögenssteuer Verdoppelung.
Bei Schnecken hat sich, zumindest ein Teil der Darstellung als vorteilhaft erwiesen.
Und auch die Kloake an sich ist evolutionär offensichtlich gar keine schlechte Entscheidung gewesen...
Ich denke das uns KI einfach ganz neue Möglichkeiten eröffnen 🤪
Und auch die Kloake an sich ist evolutionär offensichtlich gar keine schlechte Entscheidung gewesen...
Ich denke das uns KI einfach ganz neue Möglichkeiten eröffnen 🤪
August 27, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Bei Schnecken hat sich, zumindest ein Teil der Darstellung als vorteilhaft erwiesen.
Und auch die Kloake an sich ist evolutionär offensichtlich gar keine schlechte Entscheidung gewesen...
Ich denke das uns KI einfach ganz neue Möglichkeiten eröffnen 🤪
Und auch die Kloake an sich ist evolutionär offensichtlich gar keine schlechte Entscheidung gewesen...
Ich denke das uns KI einfach ganz neue Möglichkeiten eröffnen 🤪
Visagisten verstehe ich, aber: F r i s e u r e???
August 26, 2025 at 6:46 PM
Visagisten verstehe ich, aber: F r i s e u r e???
Wenn die Nachmacher die Nachmacher nachmachen..
Das hatte Nuklearia immerhin noch zuerst versammelt..
web.de/magazine/pol...
Das hatte Nuklearia immerhin noch zuerst versammelt..
web.de/magazine/pol...
Trickste die ARD bei Sommerinterview mit Grünen-Chef Demonstranten aus?
Nach dem Eklat beim Weidel-Interview hat die ARD reagiert: Das Gespräch mit Grünen-Co-Chef Felix Banaszak wurde offenbar heimlich vorverlegt. Atomkraft-Befürworter, die protestieren wollten, kamen zu ...
web.de
August 25, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Wenn die Nachmacher die Nachmacher nachmachen..
Das hatte Nuklearia immerhin noch zuerst versammelt..
web.de/magazine/pol...
Das hatte Nuklearia immerhin noch zuerst versammelt..
web.de/magazine/pol...
Ja, werd ich wohl so glauben müssen..
August 25, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Ja, werd ich wohl so glauben müssen..
So the answer to my question about the “technical how” would be: support for self-reflection!
😅
😅
August 24, 2025 at 11:03 PM
So the answer to my question about the “technical how” would be: support for self-reflection!
😅
😅
Likewise.
It was exciting to see how quickly I was prepared to give up my boundaries, assuming that I myself was on the morally “right” side.
Logic and “logic” are also two different things
It was exciting to see how quickly I was prepared to give up my boundaries, assuming that I myself was on the morally “right” side.
Logic and “logic” are also two different things
August 24, 2025 at 10:52 PM
Likewise.
It was exciting to see how quickly I was prepared to give up my boundaries, assuming that I myself was on the morally “right” side.
Logic and “logic” are also two different things
It was exciting to see how quickly I was prepared to give up my boundaries, assuming that I myself was on the morally “right” side.
Logic and “logic” are also two different things
That would have been my point.
If every network contains that, if only because there is no other “reason” to create it, it doesn't work without it, why not influence recognition of the human being in the sense of society?
But that's where it gets ethical!
If every network contains that, if only because there is no other “reason” to create it, it doesn't work without it, why not influence recognition of the human being in the sense of society?
But that's where it gets ethical!
August 24, 2025 at 10:33 PM
That would have been my point.
If every network contains that, if only because there is no other “reason” to create it, it doesn't work without it, why not influence recognition of the human being in the sense of society?
But that's where it gets ethical!
If every network contains that, if only because there is no other “reason” to create it, it doesn't work without it, why not influence recognition of the human being in the sense of society?
But that's where it gets ethical!
PS
Somewhat nastily asked:
Isn't reach (likes shares) alone the collection of followers already this - rightly - questionable "reward system"?
Could this already be called “gamification”?
Somewhat nastily asked:
Isn't reach (likes shares) alone the collection of followers already this - rightly - questionable "reward system"?
Could this already be called “gamification”?
August 24, 2025 at 10:21 PM
PS
Somewhat nastily asked:
Isn't reach (likes shares) alone the collection of followers already this - rightly - questionable "reward system"?
Could this already be called “gamification”?
Somewhat nastily asked:
Isn't reach (likes shares) alone the collection of followers already this - rightly - questionable "reward system"?
Could this already be called “gamification”?
The current state of knowledge is that it also happens without intention.
For the longest time, people have tended to live in small groups or families...
2/2
For the longest time, people have tended to live in small groups or families...
2/2
August 24, 2025 at 10:18 PM
The current state of knowledge is that it also happens without intention.
For the longest time, people have tended to live in small groups or families...
2/2
For the longest time, people have tended to live in small groups or families...
2/2
Yes.
Absolutely valid.
If you pursue and analyze this aspect further, with new data perhaps...
...it was just a quick shot from me.
Yes, the uncontrolled problem is actually a problem inherent to humans that could only be solved in a socio-psychological way with the architects of the networks.
1/
Absolutely valid.
If you pursue and analyze this aspect further, with new data perhaps...
...it was just a quick shot from me.
Yes, the uncontrolled problem is actually a problem inherent to humans that could only be solved in a socio-psychological way with the architects of the networks.
1/
August 24, 2025 at 10:18 PM
Yes.
Absolutely valid.
If you pursue and analyze this aspect further, with new data perhaps...
...it was just a quick shot from me.
Yes, the uncontrolled problem is actually a problem inherent to humans that could only be solved in a socio-psychological way with the architects of the networks.
1/
Absolutely valid.
If you pursue and analyze this aspect further, with new data perhaps...
...it was just a quick shot from me.
Yes, the uncontrolled problem is actually a problem inherent to humans that could only be solved in a socio-psychological way with the architects of the networks.
1/
The algorithm can certainly help with the latter, reconciliation does not promote rage.
Dissolve bubbles through targeted, sensitive confrontation, similar to the way biologists introduce animals into new groups, etc.
Rewards for daring or even successful exchanges.
Dissolve bubbles through targeted, sensitive confrontation, similar to the way biologists introduce animals into new groups, etc.
Rewards for daring or even successful exchanges.
August 24, 2025 at 10:03 PM
The algorithm can certainly help with the latter, reconciliation does not promote rage.
Dissolve bubbles through targeted, sensitive confrontation, similar to the way biologists introduce animals into new groups, etc.
Rewards for daring or even successful exchanges.
Dissolve bubbles through targeted, sensitive confrontation, similar to the way biologists introduce animals into new groups, etc.
Rewards for daring or even successful exchanges.
This one and then there's a 3rd one
That's why I'm numbering them.
Of course, I'm not as fast as an AI😉
bsky.app/profile/pira...
That's why I'm numbering them.
Of course, I'm not as fast as an AI😉
bsky.app/profile/pira...
qanon +Maga + libertarian technoligarchs".
Then you will quickly come across the names of some decision-makers about social media algorithms.
Don't get me wrong:
Super important point of your analysis.
But: two seemingly similar but fundamentally different phenomena with
2/
Then you will quickly come across the names of some decision-makers about social media algorithms.
Don't get me wrong:
Super important point of your analysis.
But: two seemingly similar but fundamentally different phenomena with
2/
August 24, 2025 at 9:59 PM
This one and then there's a 3rd one
That's why I'm numbering them.
Of course, I'm not as fast as an AI😉
bsky.app/profile/pira...
That's why I'm numbering them.
Of course, I'm not as fast as an AI😉
bsky.app/profile/pira...
different causes and possible solutions
3/3
3/3
August 24, 2025 at 9:50 PM
different causes and possible solutions
3/3
3/3
qanon +Maga + libertarian technoligarchs".
Then you will quickly come across the names of some decision-makers about social media algorithms.
Don't get me wrong:
Super important point of your analysis.
But: two seemingly similar but fundamentally different phenomena with
2/
Then you will quickly come across the names of some decision-makers about social media algorithms.
Don't get me wrong:
Super important point of your analysis.
But: two seemingly similar but fundamentally different phenomena with
2/
August 24, 2025 at 9:50 PM
qanon +Maga + libertarian technoligarchs".
Then you will quickly come across the names of some decision-makers about social media algorithms.
Don't get me wrong:
Super important point of your analysis.
But: two seemingly similar but fundamentally different phenomena with
2/
Then you will quickly come across the names of some decision-makers about social media algorithms.
Don't get me wrong:
Super important point of your analysis.
But: two seemingly similar but fundamentally different phenomena with
2/
It seems to me that you have come across a very important aspect of your task.
It certainly deserves much more attention in all its dynamics and also possibly controlled intentions.
PS The T-D tunnel also leads to the destruction of reality and society!
Please take a look at the topics
1/
It certainly deserves much more attention in all its dynamics and also possibly controlled intentions.
PS The T-D tunnel also leads to the destruction of reality and society!
Please take a look at the topics
1/
August 24, 2025 at 9:49 PM
It seems to me that you have come across a very important aspect of your task.
It certainly deserves much more attention in all its dynamics and also possibly controlled intentions.
PS The T-D tunnel also leads to the destruction of reality and society!
Please take a look at the topics
1/
It certainly deserves much more attention in all its dynamics and also possibly controlled intentions.
PS The T-D tunnel also leads to the destruction of reality and society!
Please take a look at the topics
1/
interesting for decision-makers.
2/2
2/2
August 24, 2025 at 9:30 PM
interesting for decision-makers.
2/2
2/2
Both tunnels would have the same harmful effect on the individual.
The “top-down” tunnel, on the other hand, I call it the “intentional” tunnel, is capable of disruptively influencing societies.
It is therefore targeted & (advertising partners, subscription models, user data) economically
1/
The “top-down” tunnel, on the other hand, I call it the “intentional” tunnel, is capable of disruptively influencing societies.
It is therefore targeted & (advertising partners, subscription models, user data) economically
1/
August 24, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Both tunnels would have the same harmful effect on the individual.
The “top-down” tunnel, on the other hand, I call it the “intentional” tunnel, is capable of disruptively influencing societies.
It is therefore targeted & (advertising partners, subscription models, user data) economically
1/
The “top-down” tunnel, on the other hand, I call it the “intentional” tunnel, is capable of disruptively influencing societies.
It is therefore targeted & (advertising partners, subscription models, user data) economically
1/