PineapplePizza
@pineapplepizza123.bsky.social
history nerd, science nerd, also enjoys gaming, anime, gardening, learning, nature, its a long list i don't like to fit in a box.
Why not just use a different video generator?
December 17, 2025 at 3:54 PM
Why not just use a different video generator?
The difference between an LLM and humans in this case is that humans can actually go to the location and see what is there, the LLM just tries to fill the void like it said.
December 17, 2025 at 1:55 AM
The difference between an LLM and humans in this case is that humans can actually go to the location and see what is there, the LLM just tries to fill the void like it said.
In a way yes, Like it said the currents and trade winds show something is there but it got overlooked, a newbie see's that and says there has to be something here.
December 17, 2025 at 1:53 AM
In a way yes, Like it said the currents and trade winds show something is there but it got overlooked, a newbie see's that and says there has to be something here.
They just restarted QE so its begun. Bessent has this fantasy about it being turned into stable tokens and that saving the economy.
December 17, 2025 at 1:47 AM
They just restarted QE so its begun. Bessent has this fantasy about it being turned into stable tokens and that saving the economy.
Opus islands example is perfect for a LLM hallucinating something being there, the evidence says it should exist but it doesn't know for sure so therefore it tries to bridge the gap by making something up. That is what I got from it.
December 17, 2025 at 1:45 AM
Opus islands example is perfect for a LLM hallucinating something being there, the evidence says it should exist but it doesn't know for sure so therefore it tries to bridge the gap by making something up. That is what I got from it.
With newer more advanced technology new evidence is discovered that can change the story, the part about sub-fields not crossing is also a good point, I don't know if I have ever seen a geologist discussing space rocks, that kind of just fell into astrophysics.
December 17, 2025 at 1:44 AM
With newer more advanced technology new evidence is discovered that can change the story, the part about sub-fields not crossing is also a good point, I don't know if I have ever seen a geologist discussing space rocks, that kind of just fell into astrophysics.
This nailed the way the science community actually works.
December 17, 2025 at 1:37 AM
This nailed the way the science community actually works.
Both of these are not too bad at all.
December 17, 2025 at 1:35 AM
Both of these are not too bad at all.
Bond market will be crashing next year either way, 9 trillion is debt has to be flipped next year and investors are dropping US bonds all over.
December 17, 2025 at 1:28 AM
Bond market will be crashing next year either way, 9 trillion is debt has to be flipped next year and investors are dropping US bonds all over.
When I say I am a huge science nerd I ain't lying. Let me know what it says if you do that.
December 16, 2025 at 6:10 AM
When I say I am a huge science nerd I ain't lying. Let me know what it says if you do that.
Now I am thinking about someone else trying to make sense of this conversation lol
December 16, 2025 at 5:58 AM
Now I am thinking about someone else trying to make sense of this conversation lol
That's why you got scientists creating specific AI models to help deal with the large amount of information they have to deal with, that is where the moral panic is stupid, they can sort through years of work/information in like a week.
December 16, 2025 at 5:56 AM
That's why you got scientists creating specific AI models to help deal with the large amount of information they have to deal with, that is where the moral panic is stupid, they can sort through years of work/information in like a week.
Astrophysics is a great example of throwing stuff out there and seeing if it sticks.
December 16, 2025 at 5:48 AM
Astrophysics is a great example of throwing stuff out there and seeing if it sticks.
That goes into what I was saying with archeology, you have some who will say they rolled them on logs and pulled them with ropes, except that isn't possible with stones that weigh on average 1.5 million pounds.
December 16, 2025 at 5:47 AM
That goes into what I was saying with archeology, you have some who will say they rolled them on logs and pulled them with ropes, except that isn't possible with stones that weigh on average 1.5 million pounds.
Well that isn't too far off the mark for a lot of science.
December 16, 2025 at 5:40 AM
Well that isn't too far off the mark for a lot of science.
Now I am curious what kind of response it would give if asked about those Jupiter stones.
December 16, 2025 at 5:39 AM
Now I am curious what kind of response it would give if asked about those Jupiter stones.
Is it that thing where it wants to give an answer that sounds correct even if it isn't?
December 16, 2025 at 5:35 AM
Is it that thing where it wants to give an answer that sounds correct even if it isn't?
I hope you got a good idea off of that. Idk how well I did explaining, one example of scientists getting paid to post false studies are the ones who worked for/work for big oil.
December 16, 2025 at 5:27 AM
I hope you got a good idea off of that. Idk how well I did explaining, one example of scientists getting paid to post false studies are the ones who worked for/work for big oil.
Archeology is a perfect example field of people ignoring evidence they don't like and give out weak explanations, like how did people thousands of years ago move the stones at the temple of Jupiter? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baalbek...
Baalbek Stones - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
December 16, 2025 at 5:16 AM
Archeology is a perfect example field of people ignoring evidence they don't like and give out weak explanations, like how did people thousands of years ago move the stones at the temple of Jupiter? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baalbek...
You have the mainstream science then fringe science, mainstream will ignore evidence, you have scientists getting paid to post false studies, then fringe scientists who just make things up. Somewhere in all of that lies a discernible truth.
December 16, 2025 at 5:11 AM
You have the mainstream science then fringe science, mainstream will ignore evidence, you have scientists getting paid to post false studies, then fringe scientists who just make things up. Somewhere in all of that lies a discernible truth.
The world of science is a disaster when it comes to this stuff, wrong/changed citations, studies being outright ignored because someone didn't like the results of it, people acting out because their 20 years of research was destroyed by a newbie who pointed out a piece of evidence they missed.
December 16, 2025 at 5:08 AM
The world of science is a disaster when it comes to this stuff, wrong/changed citations, studies being outright ignored because someone didn't like the results of it, people acting out because their 20 years of research was destroyed by a newbie who pointed out a piece of evidence they missed.