If you miss the talk, don't fret, we'll later post it on your YouTube playlist, which also has an awesome recent talk by @robp.bsky.social and Pratab Singh on quantifying uncertainty in inferred transcript abundances in sequencing data, with quite a detailed primer
www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...

Thank you for explaining!

Very interesting. So oni isn’t a nickname or something but they just use it as a completely new pronoun? This is new to me. Do you know if “oni” is meant to be for a specific gender?

I’m Turkish and I have no idea what you’re describing here. Can you use it in a sentence as an example?

I believe Orr has actually reached out for an MIA talk :) I will check out the previous one on YouTube; thank you for pointing me there

Hi Liz! This sounds very interesting; do you know if the Zoom portion is only open for UPenn participants? I’m very curious to learn about what you guys have been developing so I’m wondering if there are any plans to opening the talk up to a broader audience

It isn’t just for women, actually, men can get the vaccine, too, and it protects them against a number of cancers as well.

98% appears to be an outdated number, though, no?

should have said “attending”*

Maybe they were paying attention to a large spectrum of time (including the upcoming couple of years) while inventing attention in 2015 /s

I think private likes is a nice feature. I’d expect people would be split on this.

I similarly hate reading computational papers published in Nature. I complain to my office mates every time I need to read one 😅

I believe Nature used to mostly publish applied science, where the main message is the findings and not so much the reagents etc used to conduct an experiment. Then they started to publish in basically every field and in anything computational, methods matter a lot more to the reader.