Thanks. Congrats on your recent review - really nice. I'm sorry we didn't get this out a little earlier.

Guessing where ChemDraw structures will land when you copy/paste them.

"That's the molecular formula of a plant!" 🤔

Words of "wisdom" from an ancient technican who was asked about why he is taking absolutely no precautions whatsoever when handling some properly nasty compounds: "Ah, you know how it is. Half the compounds give ya cancer, and the other half cure it." 😐

😧 🤦

Fossil-free energy, or fossil-free feedstocks too, within 10-20 years?

It was a bit hit-and-miss, although perhaps it will improve as more accounts move over. That you can use it with an app-specific password is good (it even recommends it).

In your experience, has the quality of reviewer comments in the past, say, decade, improved, stayed the same or diminished? Quality in the sense of in-depth engagement with the science, thoughtful feedback, etc., constructive suggestions, etc.

How can you be sure the editors chose reviewers from your list? Aren't they free to ignore those suggestions or mix and match? Or, perhaps those reviewers couldn't review the manuscript this time and alternative reviewers had to be approached.

Sounds like all of life, not just chemistry.

Thank you!

Thank you!

We would be very grateful if we could be added to the list. Thanks!

We would be very grateful if we could be added to the list. Thanks!

👍