Cool I don’t this one! I will check it out thanks.

But …fine grained connectivity seems to have little to do with cytoarchitecture (see Gou et al 2025).

If you have a project idea (experiment or theory!) please apply to become an IBL partner: internationalbrainlab.com/ibl-core-apply +

This has been a blast! Such a treat to be hosted by @hhmijanelia.bsky.social at this workshop by organized by @nwb.org! Re-analysis of open-data form @dandiarchive.org with so many talented scientists has been so much fun!

(Really cool thread by the way!!)

It feels like you are onto something (need to read your book)! The field needs theories and models to be put out there, to be tested, and be dropped or propagated. What we refer to as emotions can be put into math the same way we deal with other brain « functions ». We will learn from this process!

Yes! I was mainly curious about spike interface.

Thanks for sharing this toolbox! What is the required input data format? Any sorter will do or does it need to be Kilosort?

Mice also squint more over the time course of the repeated air puffs. That could be the « state » that we track down with single unit activity…..

Interesting. We observed similar shift of inter-trial activity between air puffs in a previous study: www.nature.com/articles/s41.... No humans and no Ketamine in there, only mice. But we can trigger the same shift with subcortical stimulation (hypothalamus/habenula projection).

The suggested experiments were also incredibly naive and simplistic to me…. I.e. if region A lights up theory A is true, else if region B lights up B is true….like really?

Interesting indeed! So we loose the retinotopy as we go frontal. I wonder why is it so « slow »… Do we see here network activations (i.e. polysynaptic) in Frontal regions following monosynaptic input?

Interesting Sunday Morning read!Very nice conceptual tour on the notion of causation in Neuroscience