pierreandre01.bsky.social
@pierreandre01.bsky.social
Sure, people buy electric cars in part for moral reasons. So Tesla is more vulnerable than Amazon.
(Also, Musk seems worse than Bezos who is mostly egoistic and opportunistic, while Musk really seems ideological.)
(Also, Musk seems worse than Bezos who is mostly egoistic and opportunistic, while Musk really seems ideological.)
March 1, 2025 at 12:36 PM
Sure, people buy electric cars in part for moral reasons. So Tesla is more vulnerable than Amazon.
(Also, Musk seems worse than Bezos who is mostly egoistic and opportunistic, while Musk really seems ideological.)
(Also, Musk seems worse than Bezos who is mostly egoistic and opportunistic, while Musk really seems ideological.)
On peut aussi regretter (ou s'interroger) sur certains aspects du droit en vigueur, sans vouloir remettre en cause l'Etat de droit.
February 28, 2025 at 3:17 PM
On peut aussi regretter (ou s'interroger) sur certains aspects du droit en vigueur, sans vouloir remettre en cause l'Etat de droit.
It is quite incredible to understand econometricians can see their proposal rejected because they use the terrible word "bias".
February 22, 2025 at 10:11 AM
It is quite incredible to understand econometricians can see their proposal rejected because they use the terrible word "bias".
Is there any example of extremely good (or even good) outcomes for a dictatorship that belongs to the wealthiest countries of its time?
January 18, 2025 at 4:34 PM
Is there any example of extremely good (or even good) outcomes for a dictatorship that belongs to the wealthiest countries of its time?
"deepl write" also does English proofreading.
January 17, 2025 at 4:12 PM
"deepl write" also does English proofreading.
I agree that using AI for English proofreading totally makes sense and I would also find stupid to forbid that (I routinely use it).
However, deepl is not going to write "as an AI, I cannot study patients individually" in the output, and you should read and edit the output carefully in any case.
However, deepl is not going to write "as an AI, I cannot study patients individually" in the output, and you should read and edit the output carefully in any case.
January 17, 2025 at 1:57 PM
I agree that using AI for English proofreading totally makes sense and I would also find stupid to forbid that (I routinely use it).
However, deepl is not going to write "as an AI, I cannot study patients individually" in the output, and you should read and edit the output carefully in any case.
However, deepl is not going to write "as an AI, I cannot study patients individually" in the output, and you should read and edit the output carefully in any case.